Decolonisation deferred : Hong Kong identity in historical perspective

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The identity of Hong Kong people has created endless debates before the handover of the city from Britain to China in 1997. It has drawn people’s attention again in recent years, especially, in view of the upsurge of political activism caused by a series of China-Hong Kong conflicts. The widespread discontent over Beijing’s acts to bar Hong Kong from developing a democratic electoral system gave rise to the “Umbrella” occupation in 2014. The campaign was also overshadowed by the contentions between rival groups divided by their positions regarding the issues of political identity, local consciousness and even political separatism. This new tendency to associate pro-democracy movement with identity issue put the “One Country, Two Systems” formula to the test. Although most people did not expect China would allow the high degree of autonomous rule to be implemented in Hong Kong, more and more people now feel that Beijing’s interventions in local affairs have become regular. The rapid pace of integrating Hong Kong with China is turning Hong Kong into just another Chinese city. Out of frustration, radical thinking and ideologies emerged – in an attempt to defy the legitimacy of the handover of Hong Kong from Britain to China that happened twenty years ago. This line of “localist” thinking also expresses its advocates’ strong feeling about their cultural difference with Mainland China; they regard their quest for autonomy and democracy as part of their battle to defend Hong Kong’s own culture and identity. Yet from the pro-Beijing establishment’s point of view, the persistence of dissenting voices in Hong Kong is attributable to the uncompleted process of “return”: namely, successful only in political but not in cultural and ideological terms. Although the above views are diametrically opposite to each other, they both point to the flaws of the process in which the transferal of Hong Kong’s sovereign power was negotiated between Britain and China in the early 1980s.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCitizenship, identity and social movements in the new Hong Kong : localism after the Umbrella Movement
EditorsWai-man LAM, Luke COOPER
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages13-33
Number of pages21
ISBN (Print)9781315207971
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

decolonization
Hong Kong
China
democracy
separatism
political identity
electoral system
frustration
cultural difference
Ideologies
consciousness
persistence
legitimacy
occupation
campaign
autonomy

Cite this

LAW, W. S. (2017). Decolonisation deferred : Hong Kong identity in historical perspective. In W. LAM, & L. COOPER (Eds.), Citizenship, identity and social movements in the new Hong Kong : localism after the Umbrella Movement (pp. 13-33). Taylor and Francis.
LAW, Wing Sang. / Decolonisation deferred : Hong Kong identity in historical perspective. Citizenship, identity and social movements in the new Hong Kong : localism after the Umbrella Movement. editor / Wai-man LAM ; Luke COOPER. Taylor and Francis, 2017. pp. 13-33
@inbook{fb5baab06e584b42946c8219e7dc433a,
title = "Decolonisation deferred : Hong Kong identity in historical perspective",
abstract = "The identity of Hong Kong people has created endless debates before the handover of the city from Britain to China in 1997. It has drawn people’s attention again in recent years, especially, in view of the upsurge of political activism caused by a series of China-Hong Kong conflicts. The widespread discontent over Beijing’s acts to bar Hong Kong from developing a democratic electoral system gave rise to the “Umbrella” occupation in 2014. The campaign was also overshadowed by the contentions between rival groups divided by their positions regarding the issues of political identity, local consciousness and even political separatism. This new tendency to associate pro-democracy movement with identity issue put the “One Country, Two Systems” formula to the test. Although most people did not expect China would allow the high degree of autonomous rule to be implemented in Hong Kong, more and more people now feel that Beijing’s interventions in local affairs have become regular. The rapid pace of integrating Hong Kong with China is turning Hong Kong into just another Chinese city. Out of frustration, radical thinking and ideologies emerged – in an attempt to defy the legitimacy of the handover of Hong Kong from Britain to China that happened twenty years ago. This line of “localist” thinking also expresses its advocates’ strong feeling about their cultural difference with Mainland China; they regard their quest for autonomy and democracy as part of their battle to defend Hong Kong’s own culture and identity. Yet from the pro-Beijing establishment’s point of view, the persistence of dissenting voices in Hong Kong is attributable to the uncompleted process of “return”: namely, successful only in political but not in cultural and ideological terms. Although the above views are diametrically opposite to each other, they both point to the flaws of the process in which the transferal of Hong Kong’s sovereign power was negotiated between Britain and China in the early 1980s.",
author = "LAW, {Wing Sang}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781315207971",
pages = "13--33",
editor = "Wai-man LAM and Luke COOPER",
booktitle = "Citizenship, identity and social movements in the new Hong Kong : localism after the Umbrella Movement",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

LAW, WS 2017, Decolonisation deferred : Hong Kong identity in historical perspective. in W LAM & L COOPER (eds), Citizenship, identity and social movements in the new Hong Kong : localism after the Umbrella Movement. Taylor and Francis, pp. 13-33.

Decolonisation deferred : Hong Kong identity in historical perspective. / LAW, Wing Sang.

Citizenship, identity and social movements in the new Hong Kong : localism after the Umbrella Movement. ed. / Wai-man LAM; Luke COOPER. Taylor and Francis, 2017. p. 13-33.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Decolonisation deferred : Hong Kong identity in historical perspective

AU - LAW, Wing Sang

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The identity of Hong Kong people has created endless debates before the handover of the city from Britain to China in 1997. It has drawn people’s attention again in recent years, especially, in view of the upsurge of political activism caused by a series of China-Hong Kong conflicts. The widespread discontent over Beijing’s acts to bar Hong Kong from developing a democratic electoral system gave rise to the “Umbrella” occupation in 2014. The campaign was also overshadowed by the contentions between rival groups divided by their positions regarding the issues of political identity, local consciousness and even political separatism. This new tendency to associate pro-democracy movement with identity issue put the “One Country, Two Systems” formula to the test. Although most people did not expect China would allow the high degree of autonomous rule to be implemented in Hong Kong, more and more people now feel that Beijing’s interventions in local affairs have become regular. The rapid pace of integrating Hong Kong with China is turning Hong Kong into just another Chinese city. Out of frustration, radical thinking and ideologies emerged – in an attempt to defy the legitimacy of the handover of Hong Kong from Britain to China that happened twenty years ago. This line of “localist” thinking also expresses its advocates’ strong feeling about their cultural difference with Mainland China; they regard their quest for autonomy and democracy as part of their battle to defend Hong Kong’s own culture and identity. Yet from the pro-Beijing establishment’s point of view, the persistence of dissenting voices in Hong Kong is attributable to the uncompleted process of “return”: namely, successful only in political but not in cultural and ideological terms. Although the above views are diametrically opposite to each other, they both point to the flaws of the process in which the transferal of Hong Kong’s sovereign power was negotiated between Britain and China in the early 1980s.

AB - The identity of Hong Kong people has created endless debates before the handover of the city from Britain to China in 1997. It has drawn people’s attention again in recent years, especially, in view of the upsurge of political activism caused by a series of China-Hong Kong conflicts. The widespread discontent over Beijing’s acts to bar Hong Kong from developing a democratic electoral system gave rise to the “Umbrella” occupation in 2014. The campaign was also overshadowed by the contentions between rival groups divided by their positions regarding the issues of political identity, local consciousness and even political separatism. This new tendency to associate pro-democracy movement with identity issue put the “One Country, Two Systems” formula to the test. Although most people did not expect China would allow the high degree of autonomous rule to be implemented in Hong Kong, more and more people now feel that Beijing’s interventions in local affairs have become regular. The rapid pace of integrating Hong Kong with China is turning Hong Kong into just another Chinese city. Out of frustration, radical thinking and ideologies emerged – in an attempt to defy the legitimacy of the handover of Hong Kong from Britain to China that happened twenty years ago. This line of “localist” thinking also expresses its advocates’ strong feeling about their cultural difference with Mainland China; they regard their quest for autonomy and democracy as part of their battle to defend Hong Kong’s own culture and identity. Yet from the pro-Beijing establishment’s point of view, the persistence of dissenting voices in Hong Kong is attributable to the uncompleted process of “return”: namely, successful only in political but not in cultural and ideological terms. Although the above views are diametrically opposite to each other, they both point to the flaws of the process in which the transferal of Hong Kong’s sovereign power was negotiated between Britain and China in the early 1980s.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6693

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9781315207971

SP - 13

EP - 33

BT - Citizenship, identity and social movements in the new Hong Kong : localism after the Umbrella Movement

A2 - LAM, Wai-man

A2 - COOPER, Luke

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -

LAW WS. Decolonisation deferred : Hong Kong identity in historical perspective. In LAM W, COOPER L, editors, Citizenship, identity and social movements in the new Hong Kong : localism after the Umbrella Movement. Taylor and Francis. 2017. p. 13-33