Derrida and Mādhyamika Buddhism : from linguistic deconstruction to criticism of onto-theologies

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

Abstract

In the Derrida- Mādhyamika studies, there are still many other important parallels awaiting our discovery and exploration. Here, we propose to consider the relationship between linguistic deconstruction and ontotheological criticism in these two (anti) philosophical traditions. In the course of our inquiry, we will discover four important parallels in Derridean and Mādhyamika theories: (1) Both Derrida and the Mādhyamika thinkers develop deconstructive theories of meaning based on the similar ideas of différance and differentiam, and seek to nullify the logos and the Name of Non-Existence reified by Western idealists and Buddhist Essentialists; (2) both apply the same theories of meaning to deconstruct Matter and Existence, reified by Western materialists and Buddhist Realists; (3) both conceive of their double negation as an exercise of neither/nor logic and set forth their deconstructive formulas in similar terms of “tetrapharmakon” and “tetralemma” (catuskoti); and (4) both abolish their own tetrapharmakon and tetralemma, and embark on their self-deconstructive course along an aimless “supernumerary” and a linear “hexalemma”. While we examine these four parallels in the following sections, we shall also pinpoint the fundamental differences between the Derridean and the Mādhyamika theories and consider how these two deconstructive traditions lead to the end of philosophy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-195
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Philosophy Quarterly
Volume33
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Criticism
Jacques Derrida
Deconstruction
Buddhism
Theory of Meaning
Buddhist
Double Negation
Materialist
Philosophical Traditions
Essentialist
Exercise
Names
Thinkers
Fundamental
Logic
Philosophy
Logos
Idealist
Realist

Cite this

@article{807efbfbfa4440edadf8dbeb4a58a58a,
title = "Derrida and Mādhyamika Buddhism : from linguistic deconstruction to criticism of onto-theologies",
abstract = "In the Derrida- Mādhyamika studies, there are still many other important parallels awaiting our discovery and exploration. Here, we propose to consider the relationship between linguistic deconstruction and ontotheological criticism in these two (anti) philosophical traditions. In the course of our inquiry, we will discover four important parallels in Derridean and Mādhyamika theories: (1) Both Derrida and the Mādhyamika thinkers develop deconstructive theories of meaning based on the similar ideas of diff{\'e}rance and differentiam, and seek to nullify the logos and the Name of Non-Existence reified by Western idealists and Buddhist Essentialists; (2) both apply the same theories of meaning to deconstruct Matter and Existence, reified by Western materialists and Buddhist Realists; (3) both conceive of their double negation as an exercise of neither/nor logic and set forth their deconstructive formulas in similar terms of “tetrapharmakon” and “tetralemma” (catuskoti); and (4) both abolish their own tetrapharmakon and tetralemma, and embark on their self-deconstructive course along an aimless “supernumerary” and a linear “hexalemma”. While we examine these four parallels in the following sections, we shall also pinpoint the fundamental differences between the Derridean and the Mādhyamika theories and consider how these two deconstructive traditions lead to the end of philosophy.",
author = "Zongqi CAI",
year = "1993",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "183--195",
journal = "International Philosophical Quarterly",
issn = "0019-0365",
publisher = "Philosophy Documentation Center",
number = "2",

}

Derrida and Mādhyamika Buddhism : from linguistic deconstruction to criticism of onto-theologies. / CAI, Zongqi.

In: International Philosophy Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 2, 01.06.1993, p. 183-195.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Derrida and Mādhyamika Buddhism : from linguistic deconstruction to criticism of onto-theologies

AU - CAI, Zongqi

PY - 1993/6/1

Y1 - 1993/6/1

N2 - In the Derrida- Mādhyamika studies, there are still many other important parallels awaiting our discovery and exploration. Here, we propose to consider the relationship between linguistic deconstruction and ontotheological criticism in these two (anti) philosophical traditions. In the course of our inquiry, we will discover four important parallels in Derridean and Mādhyamika theories: (1) Both Derrida and the Mādhyamika thinkers develop deconstructive theories of meaning based on the similar ideas of différance and differentiam, and seek to nullify the logos and the Name of Non-Existence reified by Western idealists and Buddhist Essentialists; (2) both apply the same theories of meaning to deconstruct Matter and Existence, reified by Western materialists and Buddhist Realists; (3) both conceive of their double negation as an exercise of neither/nor logic and set forth their deconstructive formulas in similar terms of “tetrapharmakon” and “tetralemma” (catuskoti); and (4) both abolish their own tetrapharmakon and tetralemma, and embark on their self-deconstructive course along an aimless “supernumerary” and a linear “hexalemma”. While we examine these four parallels in the following sections, we shall also pinpoint the fundamental differences between the Derridean and the Mādhyamika theories and consider how these two deconstructive traditions lead to the end of philosophy.

AB - In the Derrida- Mādhyamika studies, there are still many other important parallels awaiting our discovery and exploration. Here, we propose to consider the relationship between linguistic deconstruction and ontotheological criticism in these two (anti) philosophical traditions. In the course of our inquiry, we will discover four important parallels in Derridean and Mādhyamika theories: (1) Both Derrida and the Mādhyamika thinkers develop deconstructive theories of meaning based on the similar ideas of différance and differentiam, and seek to nullify the logos and the Name of Non-Existence reified by Western idealists and Buddhist Essentialists; (2) both apply the same theories of meaning to deconstruct Matter and Existence, reified by Western materialists and Buddhist Realists; (3) both conceive of their double negation as an exercise of neither/nor logic and set forth their deconstructive formulas in similar terms of “tetrapharmakon” and “tetralemma” (catuskoti); and (4) both abolish their own tetrapharmakon and tetralemma, and embark on their self-deconstructive course along an aimless “supernumerary” and a linear “hexalemma”. While we examine these four parallels in the following sections, we shall also pinpoint the fundamental differences between the Derridean and the Mādhyamika theories and consider how these two deconstructive traditions lead to the end of philosophy.

UR - https://app.box.com/s/v9wr46h3f0dbo5ju84zp

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/260

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 33

SP - 183

EP - 195

JO - International Philosophical Quarterly

JF - International Philosophical Quarterly

SN - 0019-0365

IS - 2

ER -