Derridean and Madhyamika Buddhist theories of deconstruction

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In Derrida-Mādhyamika studies, there are still many other important parallels awaiting our discovery and exploration. Here, I propose to consider the relationship between linguistic deconstruction and onto-theological criticism in these two (anti)philosophical traditions. In the course of my inquiry, I will identify four important parallels in the Derridean and Mādhyamika theories. First, both Derrida and Mādhyamika thinkers develop deconstructive theories of meaning based on the similar ideas of difference and differentiam, and seek to nullify the logos and the Name of Non-Existence reified by Western idealists and Buddhist essentialists. Second, they both apply the same theories of meaning to deconstruct Matter and Existence reified by Western materialists and Buddhist realists, respectively. Third, they both conceive of their double negation as an exercise of neither/nor logic and set forth their deconstructive formulas in similar terms of “tetrapharmakon” and “tetralemma” (catuskoti). Forth, they both abolish their own tetrapharmakon and tetralemma and embark on their self-deconstructive course along an aimless “supernumerary” and along a linear “octolemma.” While I discuss these four parallels. I shall also pinpoint the fundamental differences between the Derridean and the Mādhyamika theories and consider how these two deconstructive traditions lead to the “end” of philosophy in their own fashions.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBuddhisms and deconstructions
PublisherRowman & Littlefield
Pages47-62
Number of pages16
ISBN (Print)9780742534186
Publication statusPublished - 10 Mar 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Jacques Derrida
Deconstruction
Buddhist
Theory of Meaning
Double Negation
Materialist
Philosophical Traditions
Essentialist
Criticism
Exercise
Names
Thinkers
Fundamental
Logic
Philosophy
Logos
Idealist
Realist

Cite this

CAI, Z. (2006). Derridean and Madhyamika Buddhist theories of deconstruction. In Buddhisms and deconstructions (pp. 47-62). Rowman & Littlefield.
CAI, Zongqi. / Derridean and Madhyamika Buddhist theories of deconstruction. Buddhisms and deconstructions. Rowman & Littlefield, 2006. pp. 47-62
@inbook{678c49d00e4c4aca84386cf2dbe79ddc,
title = "Derridean and Madhyamika Buddhist theories of deconstruction",
abstract = "In Derrida-Mādhyamika studies, there are still many other important parallels awaiting our discovery and exploration. Here, I propose to consider the relationship between linguistic deconstruction and onto-theological criticism in these two (anti)philosophical traditions. In the course of my inquiry, I will identify four important parallels in the Derridean and Mādhyamika theories. First, both Derrida and Mādhyamika thinkers develop deconstructive theories of meaning based on the similar ideas of difference and differentiam, and seek to nullify the logos and the Name of Non-Existence reified by Western idealists and Buddhist essentialists. Second, they both apply the same theories of meaning to deconstruct Matter and Existence reified by Western materialists and Buddhist realists, respectively. Third, they both conceive of their double negation as an exercise of neither/nor logic and set forth their deconstructive formulas in similar terms of “tetrapharmakon” and “tetralemma” (catuskoti). Forth, they both abolish their own tetrapharmakon and tetralemma and embark on their self-deconstructive course along an aimless “supernumerary” and along a linear “octolemma.” While I discuss these four parallels. I shall also pinpoint the fundamental differences between the Derridean and the Mādhyamika theories and consider how these two deconstructive traditions lead to the “end” of philosophy in their own fashions.",
author = "Zongqi CAI",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "10",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780742534186",
pages = "47--62",
booktitle = "Buddhisms and deconstructions",
publisher = "Rowman & Littlefield",
address = "United States",

}

CAI, Z 2006, Derridean and Madhyamika Buddhist theories of deconstruction. in Buddhisms and deconstructions. Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 47-62.

Derridean and Madhyamika Buddhist theories of deconstruction. / CAI, Zongqi.

Buddhisms and deconstructions. Rowman & Littlefield, 2006. p. 47-62.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Derridean and Madhyamika Buddhist theories of deconstruction

AU - CAI, Zongqi

PY - 2006/3/10

Y1 - 2006/3/10

N2 - In Derrida-Mādhyamika studies, there are still many other important parallels awaiting our discovery and exploration. Here, I propose to consider the relationship between linguistic deconstruction and onto-theological criticism in these two (anti)philosophical traditions. In the course of my inquiry, I will identify four important parallels in the Derridean and Mādhyamika theories. First, both Derrida and Mādhyamika thinkers develop deconstructive theories of meaning based on the similar ideas of difference and differentiam, and seek to nullify the logos and the Name of Non-Existence reified by Western idealists and Buddhist essentialists. Second, they both apply the same theories of meaning to deconstruct Matter and Existence reified by Western materialists and Buddhist realists, respectively. Third, they both conceive of their double negation as an exercise of neither/nor logic and set forth their deconstructive formulas in similar terms of “tetrapharmakon” and “tetralemma” (catuskoti). Forth, they both abolish their own tetrapharmakon and tetralemma and embark on their self-deconstructive course along an aimless “supernumerary” and along a linear “octolemma.” While I discuss these four parallels. I shall also pinpoint the fundamental differences between the Derridean and the Mādhyamika theories and consider how these two deconstructive traditions lead to the “end” of philosophy in their own fashions.

AB - In Derrida-Mādhyamika studies, there are still many other important parallels awaiting our discovery and exploration. Here, I propose to consider the relationship between linguistic deconstruction and onto-theological criticism in these two (anti)philosophical traditions. In the course of my inquiry, I will identify four important parallels in the Derridean and Mādhyamika theories. First, both Derrida and Mādhyamika thinkers develop deconstructive theories of meaning based on the similar ideas of difference and differentiam, and seek to nullify the logos and the Name of Non-Existence reified by Western idealists and Buddhist essentialists. Second, they both apply the same theories of meaning to deconstruct Matter and Existence reified by Western materialists and Buddhist realists, respectively. Third, they both conceive of their double negation as an exercise of neither/nor logic and set forth their deconstructive formulas in similar terms of “tetrapharmakon” and “tetralemma” (catuskoti). Forth, they both abolish their own tetrapharmakon and tetralemma and embark on their self-deconstructive course along an aimless “supernumerary” and along a linear “octolemma.” While I discuss these four parallels. I shall also pinpoint the fundamental differences between the Derridean and the Mādhyamika theories and consider how these two deconstructive traditions lead to the “end” of philosophy in their own fashions.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/256

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9780742534186

SP - 47

EP - 62

BT - Buddhisms and deconstructions

PB - Rowman & Littlefield

ER -

CAI Z. Derridean and Madhyamika Buddhist theories of deconstruction. In Buddhisms and deconstructions. Rowman & Littlefield. 2006. p. 47-62