Abstract
This article analyzes how game studies scholars cite videogames in their research. A content analysis of over 580 articles from the field’s two main journals is used to identify the currently-invisible canon of most-frequently cited games in game scholarship. We show that the canon is far more varied than previously suggested and demonstrate ways that it has changed over time. The article's research implications include explicating different functions of game citation as well as providing an empirical basis for identifying under-researched games. Our findings also identify the games with which familiarity is most important to understand existing research. Finally, we propose ways the game studies canon can help address pedagogical, technological, and legal obstacles to the development of game studies as a discipline.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 7 Aug 2019 |
Event | Digital Games Research Association Conference 2019: Game, Play and the Emerging Ludo Mix - Kyoto, Japan Duration: 6 Aug 2019 → 9 Aug 2019 http://www.digra2019.org/ |
Conference
Conference | Digital Games Research Association Conference 2019 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | DiGRA 2019 |
Country/Territory | Japan |
City | Kyoto |
Period | 6/08/19 → 9/08/19 |
Internet address |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 Authors & Digital Games Research Association DiGRA.
Keywords
- citation analysis
- scientometrics
- game studies
- canon
- pedagogy