Developing new capabilities across a supplier network through boundary crossing : a case study of a China-based MNC subsidiary and its local suppliers

Jacky F. L. HONG, Robin Stanley SNELL

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our nested case study shows how a China-based focal subsidiary of a Japanese MNC used various power bases to orchestrate a co-opetitive and diverse supplier ecosystem, and to drive cumulative cycles of collaborative capability development involving successive phases of capability gap articulation, evolution and institutionalization. All phases of capability development required the crossing of cognitive boundaries, which was facilitated by mutual engagement with boundary objects, and by common possession of generic background knowledge disseminated by the focal firm. The capability evolution phase also required the crossing of social and governance boundaries, which was supported and legitimized by shared framing assumptions about mutual benefit and continuous development, while the capability institutionalization phase also required the crossing of governance boundaries. Although the focal firm was open to suggestions for mutual benefit, it exercised unilateral control over design decisions, thereby pressurizing its suppliers to engage in capability development to meet specifications that they found arduous. Supplier diversity was a resource, and co-opetition a driving force for the discovery of solutions to manufacturability problems during the capability evolution phase, such that failure to develop requisite capabilities was uncommon.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-406
Number of pages30
JournalOrganization Studies
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Pressurization
Ecosystems
Specifications
Subsidiaries
Supplier network
Boundary crossing
Local suppliers
China
Suppliers

Bibliographical note

The research project associated with this paper was funded by University Research Grant DR07C7 from Lingnan University.

Keywords

  • MNCs
  • boundary crossing
  • boundary objects
  • capability development
  • power

Cite this

@article{d6800231c5e040059beafc4c645eacc7,
title = "Developing new capabilities across a supplier network through boundary crossing : a case study of a China-based MNC subsidiary and its local suppliers",
abstract = "Our nested case study shows how a China-based focal subsidiary of a Japanese MNC used various power bases to orchestrate a co-opetitive and diverse supplier ecosystem, and to drive cumulative cycles of collaborative capability development involving successive phases of capability gap articulation, evolution and institutionalization. All phases of capability development required the crossing of cognitive boundaries, which was facilitated by mutual engagement with boundary objects, and by common possession of generic background knowledge disseminated by the focal firm. The capability evolution phase also required the crossing of social and governance boundaries, which was supported and legitimized by shared framing assumptions about mutual benefit and continuous development, while the capability institutionalization phase also required the crossing of governance boundaries. Although the focal firm was open to suggestions for mutual benefit, it exercised unilateral control over design decisions, thereby pressurizing its suppliers to engage in capability development to meet specifications that they found arduous. Supplier diversity was a resource, and co-opetition a driving force for the discovery of solutions to manufacturability problems during the capability evolution phase, such that failure to develop requisite capabilities was uncommon.",
keywords = "MNCs, boundary crossing, boundary objects, capability development, power",
author = "HONG, {Jacky F. L.} and SNELL, {Robin Stanley}",
note = "The research project associated with this paper was funded by University Research Grant DR07C7 from Lingnan University.",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0170840612467154",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "377--406",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Developing new capabilities across a supplier network through boundary crossing : a case study of a China-based MNC subsidiary and its local suppliers. / HONG, Jacky F. L.; SNELL, Robin Stanley.

In: Organization Studies, Vol. 34, No. 3, 01.03.2013, p. 377-406.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing new capabilities across a supplier network through boundary crossing : a case study of a China-based MNC subsidiary and its local suppliers

AU - HONG, Jacky F. L.

AU - SNELL, Robin Stanley

N1 - The research project associated with this paper was funded by University Research Grant DR07C7 from Lingnan University.

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Our nested case study shows how a China-based focal subsidiary of a Japanese MNC used various power bases to orchestrate a co-opetitive and diverse supplier ecosystem, and to drive cumulative cycles of collaborative capability development involving successive phases of capability gap articulation, evolution and institutionalization. All phases of capability development required the crossing of cognitive boundaries, which was facilitated by mutual engagement with boundary objects, and by common possession of generic background knowledge disseminated by the focal firm. The capability evolution phase also required the crossing of social and governance boundaries, which was supported and legitimized by shared framing assumptions about mutual benefit and continuous development, while the capability institutionalization phase also required the crossing of governance boundaries. Although the focal firm was open to suggestions for mutual benefit, it exercised unilateral control over design decisions, thereby pressurizing its suppliers to engage in capability development to meet specifications that they found arduous. Supplier diversity was a resource, and co-opetition a driving force for the discovery of solutions to manufacturability problems during the capability evolution phase, such that failure to develop requisite capabilities was uncommon.

AB - Our nested case study shows how a China-based focal subsidiary of a Japanese MNC used various power bases to orchestrate a co-opetitive and diverse supplier ecosystem, and to drive cumulative cycles of collaborative capability development involving successive phases of capability gap articulation, evolution and institutionalization. All phases of capability development required the crossing of cognitive boundaries, which was facilitated by mutual engagement with boundary objects, and by common possession of generic background knowledge disseminated by the focal firm. The capability evolution phase also required the crossing of social and governance boundaries, which was supported and legitimized by shared framing assumptions about mutual benefit and continuous development, while the capability institutionalization phase also required the crossing of governance boundaries. Although the focal firm was open to suggestions for mutual benefit, it exercised unilateral control over design decisions, thereby pressurizing its suppliers to engage in capability development to meet specifications that they found arduous. Supplier diversity was a resource, and co-opetition a driving force for the discovery of solutions to manufacturability problems during the capability evolution phase, such that failure to develop requisite capabilities was uncommon.

KW - MNCs

KW - boundary crossing

KW - boundary objects

KW - capability development

KW - power

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/572

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875041290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0170840612467154

DO - 10.1177/0170840612467154

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 34

SP - 377

EP - 406

JO - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

IS - 3

ER -