Dogs and British colonialism : the contested ban on eating dogs in colonial Hong Kong

Shuk Wah POON

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

British colonialism brought new standards of treatment towards animals to the Far East. This article examines the ways in which the western concept of dogs and animal welfare introduced by the British colonists was received, and contested, in Hong Kong, and the colonial politics that shaped the way the controversial legislation against eating dog meat was created and passed in 1950. It argues that the original concept of animal welfare did not consider eating dogs a form of animal cruelty, as long as dogs were killed in a humane way for their meat. The dog-loving native elites, who saw dogs as pets which thus should not be eaten, manipulated the outbreak of rabies epidemic in 1949 to their advantage by petitioning the government that dog-eating was conducive to the spread of rabies. The resulting 1950 ordinance against dog-eating rationalised the taboo against eating dogs in the name of public health and extended the ‘benevolence’ of British colonialism to dogs. Yet it also brought a challenge to colonial administration due to the difficulty of its implementation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)308-328
Number of pages21
JournalThe Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History
Volume42
Issue number2
Early online date5 Nov 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

colonialism
ban
colonial age
eating behavior
Hong Kong
animal
welfare
rabies
animal welfare
Far East
meat
elite
public health
legislation
dog
Colonies
Dog
British Colonialism
politics

Cite this

@article{fd198ece0fa049f4b5a354f48904b863,
title = "Dogs and British colonialism : the contested ban on eating dogs in colonial Hong Kong",
abstract = "British colonialism brought new standards of treatment towards animals to the Far East. This article examines the ways in which the western concept of dogs and animal welfare introduced by the British colonists was received, and contested, in Hong Kong, and the colonial politics that shaped the way the controversial legislation against eating dog meat was created and passed in 1950. It argues that the original concept of animal welfare did not consider eating dogs a form of animal cruelty, as long as dogs were killed in a humane way for their meat. The dog-loving native elites, who saw dogs as pets which thus should not be eaten, manipulated the outbreak of rabies epidemic in 1949 to their advantage by petitioning the government that dog-eating was conducive to the spread of rabies. The resulting 1950 ordinance against dog-eating rationalised the taboo against eating dogs in the name of public health and extended the ‘benevolence’ of British colonialism to dogs. Yet it also brought a challenge to colonial administration due to the difficulty of its implementation.",
author = "POON, {Shuk Wah}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/03086534.2013.851873",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "308--328",
journal = "Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History",
issn = "0308-6534",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Dogs and British colonialism : the contested ban on eating dogs in colonial Hong Kong. / POON, Shuk Wah.

In: The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2014, p. 308-328.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dogs and British colonialism : the contested ban on eating dogs in colonial Hong Kong

AU - POON, Shuk Wah

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - British colonialism brought new standards of treatment towards animals to the Far East. This article examines the ways in which the western concept of dogs and animal welfare introduced by the British colonists was received, and contested, in Hong Kong, and the colonial politics that shaped the way the controversial legislation against eating dog meat was created and passed in 1950. It argues that the original concept of animal welfare did not consider eating dogs a form of animal cruelty, as long as dogs were killed in a humane way for their meat. The dog-loving native elites, who saw dogs as pets which thus should not be eaten, manipulated the outbreak of rabies epidemic in 1949 to their advantage by petitioning the government that dog-eating was conducive to the spread of rabies. The resulting 1950 ordinance against dog-eating rationalised the taboo against eating dogs in the name of public health and extended the ‘benevolence’ of British colonialism to dogs. Yet it also brought a challenge to colonial administration due to the difficulty of its implementation.

AB - British colonialism brought new standards of treatment towards animals to the Far East. This article examines the ways in which the western concept of dogs and animal welfare introduced by the British colonists was received, and contested, in Hong Kong, and the colonial politics that shaped the way the controversial legislation against eating dog meat was created and passed in 1950. It argues that the original concept of animal welfare did not consider eating dogs a form of animal cruelty, as long as dogs were killed in a humane way for their meat. The dog-loving native elites, who saw dogs as pets which thus should not be eaten, manipulated the outbreak of rabies epidemic in 1949 to their advantage by petitioning the government that dog-eating was conducive to the spread of rabies. The resulting 1950 ordinance against dog-eating rationalised the taboo against eating dogs in the name of public health and extended the ‘benevolence’ of British colonialism to dogs. Yet it also brought a challenge to colonial administration due to the difficulty of its implementation.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/554

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84901397319&doi=10.1080%2f03086534.2013.851873&partnerID=40&md5=5425b3bf6e58d85bb53f95f6fe0750e3

U2 - 10.1080/03086534.2013.851873

DO - 10.1080/03086534.2013.851873

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 42

SP - 308

EP - 328

JO - Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History

JF - Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History

SN - 0308-6534

IS - 2

ER -