Editorial

Ka Ho, Joshua MOK, Jingwei, Alex HE

Research output: Journal PublicationsEditorial/Preface (Journal)Research

Abstract

This general issue selects seven articles on a wide range of policy-related issues in Asia. The first article by Sliwinski responds to a big question: why the democratization in many Asian countries has not led to regional security? As a matter of fact, what Asia has witnessed in the past two decades is the paradoxical development of both democratization and security crises. Sliwinski’s article defies the well-known Democratic Peace Thesis and argues that the homogeneity of political regimes is not necessarily a sufficient condition for peaceful coexistence. He further contends that the absence of a common “Asian identity” is perhaps the underlying reason for the thorny security paradox in this region. The author therefore points out that the construction of a new normative basis by fusing democratic elements and Asia’s own cultural philosophies such as Confucianism is needed for a paradigmatic shift in security thinking in Asia. This article sheds light on the diverse interpretations and practices in terms of understanding democratic structures and political life across different parts of the globe, especially showing the post-cold war arrangements led by the US have encountered severe difficulty in implementation. Perhaps, we need to search for new perspectives in examining international relations and geo-political order in the highly divisive world. For scholars who are also seeking theoretical resolutions for the security paradox in Asia, Sliwinski’s article is highly recommended.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-213
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Asian Public Policy
Volume7
Issue number3
Early online date20 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

democratization
peaceful coexistence
Confucianism
political regime
cold war
international relations
peace
interpretation
homogeneity
philosophy

Cite this

MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua ; HE, Jingwei, Alex. / Editorial. In: Journal of Asian Public Policy. 2014 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 211-213.
@article{dfcf0e3179cc43509662057fd3d79ac7,
title = "Editorial",
abstract = "This general issue selects seven articles on a wide range of policy-related issues in Asia. The first article by Sliwinski responds to a big question: why the democratization in many Asian countries has not led to regional security? As a matter of fact, what Asia has witnessed in the past two decades is the paradoxical development of both democratization and security crises. Sliwinski’s article defies the well-known Democratic Peace Thesis and argues that the homogeneity of political regimes is not necessarily a sufficient condition for peaceful coexistence. He further contends that the absence of a common “Asian identity” is perhaps the underlying reason for the thorny security paradox in this region. The author therefore points out that the construction of a new normative basis by fusing democratic elements and Asia’s own cultural philosophies such as Confucianism is needed for a paradigmatic shift in security thinking in Asia. This article sheds light on the diverse interpretations and practices in terms of understanding democratic structures and political life across different parts of the globe, especially showing the post-cold war arrangements led by the US have encountered severe difficulty in implementation. Perhaps, we need to search for new perspectives in examining international relations and geo-political order in the highly divisive world. For scholars who are also seeking theoretical resolutions for the security paradox in Asia, Sliwinski’s article is highly recommended.",
author = "MOK, {Ka Ho, Joshua} and HE, {Jingwei, Alex}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/17516234.2014.972496",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "211--213",
journal = "Journal of Asian Public Policy",
issn = "1751-6234",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Editorial. / MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua; HE, Jingwei, Alex.

In: Journal of Asian Public Policy, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2014, p. 211-213.

Research output: Journal PublicationsEditorial/Preface (Journal)Research

TY - JOUR

T1 - Editorial

AU - MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua

AU - HE, Jingwei, Alex

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This general issue selects seven articles on a wide range of policy-related issues in Asia. The first article by Sliwinski responds to a big question: why the democratization in many Asian countries has not led to regional security? As a matter of fact, what Asia has witnessed in the past two decades is the paradoxical development of both democratization and security crises. Sliwinski’s article defies the well-known Democratic Peace Thesis and argues that the homogeneity of political regimes is not necessarily a sufficient condition for peaceful coexistence. He further contends that the absence of a common “Asian identity” is perhaps the underlying reason for the thorny security paradox in this region. The author therefore points out that the construction of a new normative basis by fusing democratic elements and Asia’s own cultural philosophies such as Confucianism is needed for a paradigmatic shift in security thinking in Asia. This article sheds light on the diverse interpretations and practices in terms of understanding democratic structures and political life across different parts of the globe, especially showing the post-cold war arrangements led by the US have encountered severe difficulty in implementation. Perhaps, we need to search for new perspectives in examining international relations and geo-political order in the highly divisive world. For scholars who are also seeking theoretical resolutions for the security paradox in Asia, Sliwinski’s article is highly recommended.

AB - This general issue selects seven articles on a wide range of policy-related issues in Asia. The first article by Sliwinski responds to a big question: why the democratization in many Asian countries has not led to regional security? As a matter of fact, what Asia has witnessed in the past two decades is the paradoxical development of both democratization and security crises. Sliwinski’s article defies the well-known Democratic Peace Thesis and argues that the homogeneity of political regimes is not necessarily a sufficient condition for peaceful coexistence. He further contends that the absence of a common “Asian identity” is perhaps the underlying reason for the thorny security paradox in this region. The author therefore points out that the construction of a new normative basis by fusing democratic elements and Asia’s own cultural philosophies such as Confucianism is needed for a paradigmatic shift in security thinking in Asia. This article sheds light on the diverse interpretations and practices in terms of understanding democratic structures and political life across different parts of the globe, especially showing the post-cold war arrangements led by the US have encountered severe difficulty in implementation. Perhaps, we need to search for new perspectives in examining international relations and geo-political order in the highly divisive world. For scholars who are also seeking theoretical resolutions for the security paradox in Asia, Sliwinski’s article is highly recommended.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1499

U2 - 10.1080/17516234.2014.972496

DO - 10.1080/17516234.2014.972496

M3 - Editorial/Preface (Journal)

VL - 7

SP - 211

EP - 213

JO - Journal of Asian Public Policy

JF - Journal of Asian Public Policy

SN - 1751-6234

IS - 3

ER -