Education and the market place in Hong Kong and Mainland China

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper attempts to examine how market forces have affected educational development in Hong Kong and Mainland China. In both places, there has been a trend to the decentralisation and marketisation of education in recent years, particularly in the realm of higher education. Based upon recent research conducted in Hong Kong and China, the author argues that higher education in these two places has been significantly affected by emerging market forces. The core of the paper is confined to the discussion of two major issues: |Wbuser charges|WB] and |Wbthe introduction of “competition” and cost recovery|WB] in education. The main focus of this paper is on what strategies education institutions in Hong Kong and China have employed in response to the strong tide of marketisation. Particular attention will be given to discussing how markets and competition have affected the governance and delivery of educational services in Hong Kong and China. This comparative study has demonstrated that even though the recent developments in higher education in these two places have been experiencing a similar global trend, the global tide of universal trend in which private charges, market competition, non-state provision, corporate governance, system-wide performance management should not be treated as a simplistic notion of undifferentiated universal trend. Instead, different places may take different configurations in cases of marketization which remain national-specific as well as global.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-158
Number of pages26
JournalHigher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning
Volume37
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hong Kong
China
market
education
trend
cost recovery
corporate governance
decentralization
governance
management
performance

Cite this

@article{0e3258767a8644959409ad3e91d8c1e3,
title = "Education and the market place in Hong Kong and Mainland China",
abstract = "This paper attempts to examine how market forces have affected educational development in Hong Kong and Mainland China. In both places, there has been a trend to the decentralisation and marketisation of education in recent years, particularly in the realm of higher education. Based upon recent research conducted in Hong Kong and China, the author argues that higher education in these two places has been significantly affected by emerging market forces. The core of the paper is confined to the discussion of two major issues: |Wbuser charges|WB] and |Wbthe introduction of “competition” and cost recovery|WB] in education. The main focus of this paper is on what strategies education institutions in Hong Kong and China have employed in response to the strong tide of marketisation. Particular attention will be given to discussing how markets and competition have affected the governance and delivery of educational services in Hong Kong and China. This comparative study has demonstrated that even though the recent developments in higher education in these two places have been experiencing a similar global trend, the global tide of universal trend in which private charges, market competition, non-state provision, corporate governance, system-wide performance management should not be treated as a simplistic notion of undifferentiated universal trend. Instead, different places may take different configurations in cases of marketization which remain national-specific as well as global.",
author = "MOK, {Ka Ho, Joshua}",
year = "1999",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "133--158",
journal = "Higher Education",
issn = "0018-1560",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

Education and the market place in Hong Kong and Mainland China. / MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua.

In: Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.03.1999, p. 133-158.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Education and the market place in Hong Kong and Mainland China

AU - MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua

PY - 1999/3/1

Y1 - 1999/3/1

N2 - This paper attempts to examine how market forces have affected educational development in Hong Kong and Mainland China. In both places, there has been a trend to the decentralisation and marketisation of education in recent years, particularly in the realm of higher education. Based upon recent research conducted in Hong Kong and China, the author argues that higher education in these two places has been significantly affected by emerging market forces. The core of the paper is confined to the discussion of two major issues: |Wbuser charges|WB] and |Wbthe introduction of “competition” and cost recovery|WB] in education. The main focus of this paper is on what strategies education institutions in Hong Kong and China have employed in response to the strong tide of marketisation. Particular attention will be given to discussing how markets and competition have affected the governance and delivery of educational services in Hong Kong and China. This comparative study has demonstrated that even though the recent developments in higher education in these two places have been experiencing a similar global trend, the global tide of universal trend in which private charges, market competition, non-state provision, corporate governance, system-wide performance management should not be treated as a simplistic notion of undifferentiated universal trend. Instead, different places may take different configurations in cases of marketization which remain national-specific as well as global.

AB - This paper attempts to examine how market forces have affected educational development in Hong Kong and Mainland China. In both places, there has been a trend to the decentralisation and marketisation of education in recent years, particularly in the realm of higher education. Based upon recent research conducted in Hong Kong and China, the author argues that higher education in these two places has been significantly affected by emerging market forces. The core of the paper is confined to the discussion of two major issues: |Wbuser charges|WB] and |Wbthe introduction of “competition” and cost recovery|WB] in education. The main focus of this paper is on what strategies education institutions in Hong Kong and China have employed in response to the strong tide of marketisation. Particular attention will be given to discussing how markets and competition have affected the governance and delivery of educational services in Hong Kong and China. This comparative study has demonstrated that even though the recent developments in higher education in these two places have been experiencing a similar global trend, the global tide of universal trend in which private charges, market competition, non-state provision, corporate governance, system-wide performance management should not be treated as a simplistic notion of undifferentiated universal trend. Instead, different places may take different configurations in cases of marketization which remain national-specific as well as global.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1388

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 37

SP - 133

EP - 158

JO - Higher Education

JF - Higher Education

SN - 0018-1560

IS - 2

ER -