Educational reforms and coping strategies under the tidal wave of marketisation : a comparative study of Hong Kong and the mainland

Kin Keung, David CHAN, Ka Ho, Joshua MOK

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has been a global trend, since the 1980s, that the process of marketisation has been influential in the decision making of social policies around the world, and that this tidal wave is now crossing over to the Asia–Pacific region as well. Education policy, as one of the important social policies for many developing countries, has been influential in the forefront of national development in terms of manpower training, as well as in other arenas of economic and social developments. In this way, these countries are trying to improve the quality of their educational services so that they can be more competitive in order to cater for the demands in the international markets. One of the outcomes of this global trend is the international quality assurance movement in streamlining the educational institutions as well as in using different coping strategies to promote quality education for all concerned. For the Chinese mainland, it seems that the central government is adopting a policy of decentralisation in getting local governments to use multiple channels of resources and other methods to provide for their own educational services. Hong Kong as a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China, however, has adopted quite a different approach by employing the principle of managerialism in order to enhance its competitiveness in providing quality education to meet the increasing market demands. Hence, the present study is to compare and contrast the educational reforms and coping strategies that have been adopted by the socialist mainland, on the one hand, and the capitalist Hong Kong SAR, on the other hand, in order to face this new challenge of marketisation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-41
Number of pages21
JournalComparative Education
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

educational reform
Hong Kong
coping
education
national development
manpower
market
trend
quality assurance
educational institution
social development
competitiveness
decentralization
developing country
decision making
China
resources
economics
Social Policy

Cite this

@article{a9b684509d944f9bbc7b9052b4589a24,
title = "Educational reforms and coping strategies under the tidal wave of marketisation : a comparative study of Hong Kong and the mainland",
abstract = "It has been a global trend, since the 1980s, that the process of marketisation has been influential in the decision making of social policies around the world, and that this tidal wave is now crossing over to the Asia–Pacific region as well. Education policy, as one of the important social policies for many developing countries, has been influential in the forefront of national development in terms of manpower training, as well as in other arenas of economic and social developments. In this way, these countries are trying to improve the quality of their educational services so that they can be more competitive in order to cater for the demands in the international markets. One of the outcomes of this global trend is the international quality assurance movement in streamlining the educational institutions as well as in using different coping strategies to promote quality education for all concerned. For the Chinese mainland, it seems that the central government is adopting a policy of decentralisation in getting local governments to use multiple channels of resources and other methods to provide for their own educational services. Hong Kong as a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China, however, has adopted quite a different approach by employing the principle of managerialism in order to enhance its competitiveness in providing quality education to meet the increasing market demands. Hence, the present study is to compare and contrast the educational reforms and coping strategies that have been adopted by the socialist mainland, on the one hand, and the capitalist Hong Kong SAR, on the other hand, in order to face this new challenge of marketisation.",
author = "CHAN, {Kin Keung, David} and MOK, {Ka Ho, Joshua}",
year = "2001",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03050060020020417",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "21--41",
journal = "Comparative Education",
issn = "0305-0068",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Educational reforms and coping strategies under the tidal wave of marketisation : a comparative study of Hong Kong and the mainland. / CHAN, Kin Keung, David; MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua.

In: Comparative Education, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.02.2001, p. 21-41.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Educational reforms and coping strategies under the tidal wave of marketisation : a comparative study of Hong Kong and the mainland

AU - CHAN, Kin Keung, David

AU - MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua

PY - 2001/2/1

Y1 - 2001/2/1

N2 - It has been a global trend, since the 1980s, that the process of marketisation has been influential in the decision making of social policies around the world, and that this tidal wave is now crossing over to the Asia–Pacific region as well. Education policy, as one of the important social policies for many developing countries, has been influential in the forefront of national development in terms of manpower training, as well as in other arenas of economic and social developments. In this way, these countries are trying to improve the quality of their educational services so that they can be more competitive in order to cater for the demands in the international markets. One of the outcomes of this global trend is the international quality assurance movement in streamlining the educational institutions as well as in using different coping strategies to promote quality education for all concerned. For the Chinese mainland, it seems that the central government is adopting a policy of decentralisation in getting local governments to use multiple channels of resources and other methods to provide for their own educational services. Hong Kong as a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China, however, has adopted quite a different approach by employing the principle of managerialism in order to enhance its competitiveness in providing quality education to meet the increasing market demands. Hence, the present study is to compare and contrast the educational reforms and coping strategies that have been adopted by the socialist mainland, on the one hand, and the capitalist Hong Kong SAR, on the other hand, in order to face this new challenge of marketisation.

AB - It has been a global trend, since the 1980s, that the process of marketisation has been influential in the decision making of social policies around the world, and that this tidal wave is now crossing over to the Asia–Pacific region as well. Education policy, as one of the important social policies for many developing countries, has been influential in the forefront of national development in terms of manpower training, as well as in other arenas of economic and social developments. In this way, these countries are trying to improve the quality of their educational services so that they can be more competitive in order to cater for the demands in the international markets. One of the outcomes of this global trend is the international quality assurance movement in streamlining the educational institutions as well as in using different coping strategies to promote quality education for all concerned. For the Chinese mainland, it seems that the central government is adopting a policy of decentralisation in getting local governments to use multiple channels of resources and other methods to provide for their own educational services. Hong Kong as a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China, however, has adopted quite a different approach by employing the principle of managerialism in order to enhance its competitiveness in providing quality education to meet the increasing market demands. Hence, the present study is to compare and contrast the educational reforms and coping strategies that have been adopted by the socialist mainland, on the one hand, and the capitalist Hong Kong SAR, on the other hand, in order to face this new challenge of marketisation.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1397

U2 - 10.1080/03050060020020417

DO - 10.1080/03050060020020417

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 37

SP - 21

EP - 41

JO - Comparative Education

JF - Comparative Education

SN - 0305-0068

IS - 1

ER -