TY - JOUR
T1 - Educational usage of mobile devices : differences between postgraduate and undergraduate students
AU - LAU, Ka Po
AU - CHIU, K. W., Dickson
AU - HO, K. W., Kevin
AU - LO, Patrick
AU - SEE-TO, Wing Kuen, Eric
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - The rapid increase of smartphone usage in recent years has provided students the opportunity to participate in mobile learning (m-learning) anywhere, anytime. Academic institutions are also following this trend to launch many m-learning services. This article investigates the differences of the user needs between undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) students though an online survey with 140 Library Information Systems (LIS) subjects in a Japanese university in order to provide solid foundations for future m-learning studies. We find that UG and PG students do not show significant differences in adopting m-learning by smartphones despite the fact that they have different learning patterns. The m-learning frequencies of smartphones generally range from weekly to monthly, where using search engines is the most frequent, and reading academic resources is the least frequent. They tend to use these services for handling their daily routines (such as search engine, social networks) rather than their academic activities (such as using online databases to search for academic materials). Further, the results also show that content displaying issues (e.g., small display screen, text unable to enlarge) are barriers for most subjects in using these m-learning services.
AB - The rapid increase of smartphone usage in recent years has provided students the opportunity to participate in mobile learning (m-learning) anywhere, anytime. Academic institutions are also following this trend to launch many m-learning services. This article investigates the differences of the user needs between undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) students though an online survey with 140 Library Information Systems (LIS) subjects in a Japanese university in order to provide solid foundations for future m-learning studies. We find that UG and PG students do not show significant differences in adopting m-learning by smartphones despite the fact that they have different learning patterns. The m-learning frequencies of smartphones generally range from weekly to monthly, where using search engines is the most frequent, and reading academic resources is the least frequent. They tend to use these services for handling their daily routines (such as search engine, social networks) rather than their academic activities (such as using online databases to search for academic materials). Further, the results also show that content displaying issues (e.g., small display screen, text unable to enlarge) are barriers for most subjects in using these m-learning services.
KW - Comparison
KW - Learning patterns
KW - Library and Information Science (LIS)
KW - Mixed method
KW - Mobile learning (m-learning)
KW - Smartphone
UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6133
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017146537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.acalib.2017.03.004
DO - 10.1016/j.acalib.2017.03.004
M3 - Journal Article (refereed)
SN - 0099-1333
VL - 43
SP - 201
EP - 208
JO - The Journal of Academic Librarianship
JF - The Journal of Academic Librarianship
IS - 3
ER -