Abstract
The present study examines how dilemma type (personal or impersonal moral dilemma), language (native or foreign) and emotion arousal to a dilemma could affect Chinese-English bilinguals' deontological vs utilitarian moral choices regarding 39 moral dilemmas. How emotion arousal plays a mediating role in the effects of dilemma type and language on moral choices is also investigated. As shown in multilevel analyses, participants made fewer utilitarian choices for personal dilemmas than impersonal dilemmas. Although emotion arousal of dilemmas significantly mediated this effect of dilemma type, the indirect effect of dilemma type through arousal on moral choices was inconsistent with the direct effect of dilemma type on moral choices. For the effect of language, participants made more utilitarian choices in the Footbridge (personal) dilemma that was presented in foreign language than in native language. However, this effect was not mediated by arousal, suggesting that it could not be attributed to the emotion-reducing effect of foreign language. Moreover, there was no language effect on moral choices in analyses that included all 39 dilemmas or only 22 personal dilemmas, indicating the need in future research for further identifying the potential mediators that trigger the foreign language effect on moral choices.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 55-65 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Asian Journal of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 12 Jan 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Funding
There is no financial support or relationships that may pose a conflict of interest associated with the current research.
Keywords
- Deontology
- Emotion
- Language
- Moral dilemma
- Utilitarian