Effects of openness, problem solving, and blaming on learning : an experiment in China

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers have considered interdependence and interaction among individuals and groups as critical for promoting learning in organizations. In an experiment with 80 participants in China, the present authors found that (a) open discussion compared with avoiding discussion and (b) problem solving compared with blaming stimulated the exploration, integration, and adoption of alternative ideas in addition to strengthening interpersonal relationships. The results also indicated the possibility that openness and problem solving have these effects by developing a perceived cooperative interdependence that encourages people to believe that incorporating alternative ideas can help them succeed. Avoidance and blaming, on the other hand, seemed to result in a competitive struggle to see who could impose their ideas on the other, leaving people committed to their original thinking.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)629-644
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume145
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2005

Fingerprint

China
Learning
Research Personnel
Thinking

Keywords

  • Cooperation and competition
  • Decision making
  • Group and teams
  • Learning

Cite this

@article{08adc1fb663a435087a15ac102c3468b,
title = "Effects of openness, problem solving, and blaming on learning : an experiment in China",
abstract = "Researchers have considered interdependence and interaction among individuals and groups as critical for promoting learning in organizations. In an experiment with 80 participants in China, the present authors found that (a) open discussion compared with avoiding discussion and (b) problem solving compared with blaming stimulated the exploration, integration, and adoption of alternative ideas in addition to strengthening interpersonal relationships. The results also indicated the possibility that openness and problem solving have these effects by developing a perceived cooperative interdependence that encourages people to believe that incorporating alternative ideas can help them succeed. Avoidance and blaming, on the other hand, seemed to result in a competitive struggle to see who could impose their ideas on the other, leaving people committed to their original thinking.",
keywords = "Cooperation and competition, Decision making, Group and teams, Learning",
author = "TJOSVOLD, {Dean William} and SUN, {Haifa F.} and WAN, {Man Kei, Paulina}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3200/SOCP.145.6.629-644",
language = "English",
volume = "145",
pages = "629--644",
journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

Effects of openness, problem solving, and blaming on learning : an experiment in China. / TJOSVOLD, Dean William; SUN, Haifa F.; WAN, Man Kei, Paulina.

In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 145, No. 6, 01.12.2005, p. 629-644.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of openness, problem solving, and blaming on learning : an experiment in China

AU - TJOSVOLD, Dean William

AU - SUN, Haifa F.

AU - WAN, Man Kei, Paulina

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - Researchers have considered interdependence and interaction among individuals and groups as critical for promoting learning in organizations. In an experiment with 80 participants in China, the present authors found that (a) open discussion compared with avoiding discussion and (b) problem solving compared with blaming stimulated the exploration, integration, and adoption of alternative ideas in addition to strengthening interpersonal relationships. The results also indicated the possibility that openness and problem solving have these effects by developing a perceived cooperative interdependence that encourages people to believe that incorporating alternative ideas can help them succeed. Avoidance and blaming, on the other hand, seemed to result in a competitive struggle to see who could impose their ideas on the other, leaving people committed to their original thinking.

AB - Researchers have considered interdependence and interaction among individuals and groups as critical for promoting learning in organizations. In an experiment with 80 participants in China, the present authors found that (a) open discussion compared with avoiding discussion and (b) problem solving compared with blaming stimulated the exploration, integration, and adoption of alternative ideas in addition to strengthening interpersonal relationships. The results also indicated the possibility that openness and problem solving have these effects by developing a perceived cooperative interdependence that encourages people to believe that incorporating alternative ideas can help them succeed. Avoidance and blaming, on the other hand, seemed to result in a competitive struggle to see who could impose their ideas on the other, leaving people committed to their original thinking.

KW - Cooperation and competition

KW - Decision making

KW - Group and teams

KW - Learning

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2086

U2 - 10.3200/SOCP.145.6.629-644

DO - 10.3200/SOCP.145.6.629-644

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 145

SP - 629

EP - 644

JO - Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

IS - 6

ER -