Equal or equitable pay? Individual differences in pay fairness perceptions

Tae Yeol KIM, Jie WANG*, Tingting CHEN, Yue ZHU, Rui SUN

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined how social comparison (i.e., comparing one's pay to similar others' pay) and deserved comparison (i.e., comparing one's pay to one's deserved pay) affect pay fairness perceptions, and the individual differences in the comparison processes. Results based on a field study with a sample of 167 employees showed pay fairness was low when employees received lower pay than a similar other (or what they deserved), increased as their pay exceeded that of a similar other (or deserved pay) to some extent, and then decreased when overpayment was considerable. Second, pay fairness increased as one's actual and similar others' pay levels both increased while pay fairness remained the same as one's actual and the deserved pay levels both increased. In addition, the “threshold” that people start to perceive overpayment as less fair occurred more quickly for those with higher preference for consistency in social comparison and for those with higher preference for the merit principle in deserved comparison. We also conducted experiments, and the results generally replicated the findings in the field study. These findings offer theoretical implications regarding organizational justice, as well as practical implications for designing and executing a compensation system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-186
Number of pages18
JournalHuman Resource Management
Volume58
Issue number2
Early online date12 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Individuality
Personnel
Experiments
Fairness perceptions
Individual differences
Compensation and Redress
Fairness

Bibliographical note

Funding information: Lingnan University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 71502164

Keywords

  • deserved comparison
  • pay fairness
  • preference for consistency
  • preference for the merit principle
  • social comparison

Cite this

KIM, Tae Yeol ; WANG, Jie ; CHEN, Tingting ; ZHU, Yue ; SUN, Rui. / Equal or equitable pay? Individual differences in pay fairness perceptions. In: Human Resource Management. 2019 ; Vol. 58, No. 2. pp. 169-186.
@article{610642818b7744bf81fa97dcb03a08ce,
title = "Equal or equitable pay? Individual differences in pay fairness perceptions",
abstract = "This study examined how social comparison (i.e., comparing one's pay to similar others' pay) and deserved comparison (i.e., comparing one's pay to one's deserved pay) affect pay fairness perceptions, and the individual differences in the comparison processes. Results based on a field study with a sample of 167 employees showed pay fairness was low when employees received lower pay than a similar other (or what they deserved), increased as their pay exceeded that of a similar other (or deserved pay) to some extent, and then decreased when overpayment was considerable. Second, pay fairness increased as one's actual and similar others' pay levels both increased while pay fairness remained the same as one's actual and the deserved pay levels both increased. In addition, the “threshold” that people start to perceive overpayment as less fair occurred more quickly for those with higher preference for consistency in social comparison and for those with higher preference for the merit principle in deserved comparison. We also conducted experiments, and the results generally replicated the findings in the field study. These findings offer theoretical implications regarding organizational justice, as well as practical implications for designing and executing a compensation system.",
keywords = "deserved comparison, pay fairness, preference for consistency, preference for the merit principle, social comparison",
author = "KIM, {Tae Yeol} and Jie WANG and Tingting CHEN and Yue ZHU and Rui SUN",
note = "Funding information: Lingnan University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 71502164",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/hrm.21944",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "169--186",
journal = "Human Resource Management",
issn = "0090-4848",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Equal or equitable pay? Individual differences in pay fairness perceptions. / KIM, Tae Yeol; WANG, Jie; CHEN, Tingting; ZHU, Yue; SUN, Rui.

In: Human Resource Management, Vol. 58, No. 2, 03.2019, p. 169-186.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equal or equitable pay? Individual differences in pay fairness perceptions

AU - KIM, Tae Yeol

AU - WANG, Jie

AU - CHEN, Tingting

AU - ZHU, Yue

AU - SUN, Rui

N1 - Funding information: Lingnan University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 71502164

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - This study examined how social comparison (i.e., comparing one's pay to similar others' pay) and deserved comparison (i.e., comparing one's pay to one's deserved pay) affect pay fairness perceptions, and the individual differences in the comparison processes. Results based on a field study with a sample of 167 employees showed pay fairness was low when employees received lower pay than a similar other (or what they deserved), increased as their pay exceeded that of a similar other (or deserved pay) to some extent, and then decreased when overpayment was considerable. Second, pay fairness increased as one's actual and similar others' pay levels both increased while pay fairness remained the same as one's actual and the deserved pay levels both increased. In addition, the “threshold” that people start to perceive overpayment as less fair occurred more quickly for those with higher preference for consistency in social comparison and for those with higher preference for the merit principle in deserved comparison. We also conducted experiments, and the results generally replicated the findings in the field study. These findings offer theoretical implications regarding organizational justice, as well as practical implications for designing and executing a compensation system.

AB - This study examined how social comparison (i.e., comparing one's pay to similar others' pay) and deserved comparison (i.e., comparing one's pay to one's deserved pay) affect pay fairness perceptions, and the individual differences in the comparison processes. Results based on a field study with a sample of 167 employees showed pay fairness was low when employees received lower pay than a similar other (or what they deserved), increased as their pay exceeded that of a similar other (or deserved pay) to some extent, and then decreased when overpayment was considerable. Second, pay fairness increased as one's actual and similar others' pay levels both increased while pay fairness remained the same as one's actual and the deserved pay levels both increased. In addition, the “threshold” that people start to perceive overpayment as less fair occurred more quickly for those with higher preference for consistency in social comparison and for those with higher preference for the merit principle in deserved comparison. We also conducted experiments, and the results generally replicated the findings in the field study. These findings offer theoretical implications regarding organizational justice, as well as practical implications for designing and executing a compensation system.

KW - deserved comparison

KW - pay fairness

KW - preference for consistency

KW - preference for the merit principle

KW - social comparison

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054917217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hrm.21944

DO - 10.1002/hrm.21944

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 58

SP - 169

EP - 186

JO - Human Resource Management

JF - Human Resource Management

SN - 0090-4848

IS - 2

ER -