Evaluating the relevance of quality to institutional performance assessment in higher education

James Stuart POUNDER

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article describes a study which evaluated the relevance of quality to institutional performance assessment in higher education. A set of scales suitable for the valid and reliable (i.e. precise) self-rating of the effectiveness of higher education institutions in Hong Kong was developed. The method of scale development served to test the applicability of the nine effectiveness dimensions contained in the Competing Values Model of Organizational Effectiveness (Quinn and Rohrbaugh, 1981, 1983) to institutional performance assessment in Hong Kong higher education. One of the nine effectiveness dimensions is quality. Application of the scale development method failed to produce a scale capable of the valid and reliable self-rating of the quality dimension. The study highlighted the multidimensional and imprecise nature of the quality concept. It is argued that additional concepts, such as those proposed in the study, are necessary to inject precision into institutional performance assessment. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]; Copyright of Evaluation is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)66-78
    Number of pages13
    JournalEvaluation
    Volume6
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2000

    Fingerprint

    performance assessment
    higher education
    Hong Kong
    education
    rating
    evaluation
    Values
    method

    Cite this

    @article{c235b7837aa74b93aeafae6602783cbd,
    title = "Evaluating the relevance of quality to institutional performance assessment in higher education",
    abstract = "This article describes a study which evaluated the relevance of quality to institutional performance assessment in higher education. A set of scales suitable for the valid and reliable (i.e. precise) self-rating of the effectiveness of higher education institutions in Hong Kong was developed. The method of scale development served to test the applicability of the nine effectiveness dimensions contained in the Competing Values Model of Organizational Effectiveness (Quinn and Rohrbaugh, 1981, 1983) to institutional performance assessment in Hong Kong higher education. One of the nine effectiveness dimensions is quality. Application of the scale development method failed to produce a scale capable of the valid and reliable self-rating of the quality dimension. The study highlighted the multidimensional and imprecise nature of the quality concept. It is argued that additional concepts, such as those proposed in the study, are necessary to inject precision into institutional performance assessment. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]; Copyright of Evaluation is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.",
    author = "POUNDER, {James Stuart}",
    year = "2000",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/13563890022209127",
    language = "English",
    volume = "6",
    pages = "66--78",
    journal = "Evaluation",
    issn = "1356-3890",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "1",

    }

    Evaluating the relevance of quality to institutional performance assessment in higher education. / POUNDER, James Stuart.

    In: Evaluation, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.01.2000, p. 66-78.

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Evaluating the relevance of quality to institutional performance assessment in higher education

    AU - POUNDER, James Stuart

    PY - 2000/1/1

    Y1 - 2000/1/1

    N2 - This article describes a study which evaluated the relevance of quality to institutional performance assessment in higher education. A set of scales suitable for the valid and reliable (i.e. precise) self-rating of the effectiveness of higher education institutions in Hong Kong was developed. The method of scale development served to test the applicability of the nine effectiveness dimensions contained in the Competing Values Model of Organizational Effectiveness (Quinn and Rohrbaugh, 1981, 1983) to institutional performance assessment in Hong Kong higher education. One of the nine effectiveness dimensions is quality. Application of the scale development method failed to produce a scale capable of the valid and reliable self-rating of the quality dimension. The study highlighted the multidimensional and imprecise nature of the quality concept. It is argued that additional concepts, such as those proposed in the study, are necessary to inject precision into institutional performance assessment. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]; Copyright of Evaluation is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.

    AB - This article describes a study which evaluated the relevance of quality to institutional performance assessment in higher education. A set of scales suitable for the valid and reliable (i.e. precise) self-rating of the effectiveness of higher education institutions in Hong Kong was developed. The method of scale development served to test the applicability of the nine effectiveness dimensions contained in the Competing Values Model of Organizational Effectiveness (Quinn and Rohrbaugh, 1981, 1983) to institutional performance assessment in Hong Kong higher education. One of the nine effectiveness dimensions is quality. Application of the scale development method failed to produce a scale capable of the valid and reliable self-rating of the quality dimension. The study highlighted the multidimensional and imprecise nature of the quality concept. It is argued that additional concepts, such as those proposed in the study, are necessary to inject precision into institutional performance assessment. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]; Copyright of Evaluation is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.

    UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1530

    U2 - 10.1177/13563890022209127

    DO - 10.1177/13563890022209127

    M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

    VL - 6

    SP - 66

    EP - 78

    JO - Evaluation

    JF - Evaluation

    SN - 1356-3890

    IS - 1

    ER -