Abstract
Objective: This study examines the quality of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature in terms of a number of criteria commonly adopted in the field of qualitative research.
Method: Using qualitative and evaluation as search terms, relevant qualitative evaluation studies from 1990 to 2003 indexed by Social Work Abstracts were examined, and their quality was evaluated.
Results: The review shows that the quality of published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work field is not high and that many of the reviewed studies are not sensitive to the following issues: philosophical base of the study, auditability, bias, truth value, consistency, and critical interpretations of the data.
Conclusions: Social workers using findings arising from published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in social work should be cautious and social workers conducting qualitative evaluation studies should be sensitive to the issue of quality. Adequate training for social workers on qualitative evaluation should also be carried out.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 180-194 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Research on Social Work Practice |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Criteriology
- Evaluation
- Evaluative criteria
- Qualitative research
- Social work literature
Cite this
}
Evaluation of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature (1990-2003) : evidence that constitutes a wake-up call. / SHEK, Daniel T. L.; TANG, Vera M. Y.; HAN, X. Y.
In: Research on Social Work Practice, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.05.2005, p. 180-194.Research output: Journal Publications › Journal Article (refereed)
TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature (1990-2003) : evidence that constitutes a wake-up call
AU - SHEK, Daniel T. L.
AU - TANG, Vera M. Y.
AU - HAN, X. Y.
PY - 2005/5/1
Y1 - 2005/5/1
N2 - Objective: This study examines the quality of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature in terms of a number of criteria commonly adopted in the field of qualitative research. Method: Using qualitative and evaluation as search terms, relevant qualitative evaluation studies from 1990 to 2003 indexed by Social Work Abstracts were examined, and their quality was evaluated. Results: The review shows that the quality of published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work field is not high and that many of the reviewed studies are not sensitive to the following issues: philosophical base of the study, auditability, bias, truth value, consistency, and critical interpretations of the data. Conclusions: Social workers using findings arising from published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in social work should be cautious and social workers conducting qualitative evaluation studies should be sensitive to the issue of quality. Adequate training for social workers on qualitative evaluation should also be carried out.
AB - Objective: This study examines the quality of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature in terms of a number of criteria commonly adopted in the field of qualitative research. Method: Using qualitative and evaluation as search terms, relevant qualitative evaluation studies from 1990 to 2003 indexed by Social Work Abstracts were examined, and their quality was evaluated. Results: The review shows that the quality of published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work field is not high and that many of the reviewed studies are not sensitive to the following issues: philosophical base of the study, auditability, bias, truth value, consistency, and critical interpretations of the data. Conclusions: Social workers using findings arising from published evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in social work should be cautious and social workers conducting qualitative evaluation studies should be sensitive to the issue of quality. Adequate training for social workers on qualitative evaluation should also be carried out.
KW - Criteriology
KW - Evaluation
KW - Evaluative criteria
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Social work literature
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17444404904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1049731504271603
DO - 10.1177/1049731504271603
M3 - Journal Article (refereed)
AN - SCOPUS:17444404904
VL - 15
SP - 180
EP - 194
JO - Research on Social Work Practice
JF - Research on Social Work Practice
SN - 1049-7315
IS - 3
ER -