Evolutionary Transition Markers and the Origins of Consciousness3

Marta HALINA, David HARRISON, Colin KLEIN

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Unlimited associative learning (UAL) has recently been advanced as an epistemic marker for the evolutionary origin of consciousness. One feature of this approach is that it eschews theoretical commitments concerning the mechanisms responsible for consciousness. We argue that the plausibility of the UAL framework depends on making such theoretical commitments. Without such commitments, the UAL framework remains silent regarding important edge cases and fails to distinguish between clusters and clutters of properties sufficient for consciousness. We conclude that the UAL framework would benefit from returning to earlier theory-heavy approaches — i.e. those that make substantial commitments to the mechanisms responsible for consciousness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)62-77
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Consciousness Studies
Volume29
Issue number3-4
Early online date1 Mar 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
@ IprintAcadeic.

Funding

We thank Benjamin Henke and two anonymous reviewers for their feedback and discussion, as well as the editors of this special issue, particularly Heather Browning. This project was supported by a grant from the Templeton World Charity Foundation.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evolutionary Transition Markers and the Origins of Consciousness3'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this