Expected loss recognition and banks’ management forecasts

Aurelius AARON, Jeong-Bon KIM, Chong WANG*, Feng Harry WU

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

Accounting rules for credit impairment recognition have been shifting to a more forward-looking approach based on expected losses. We examine how the adoption of an expected loss model (ELM) influences banks’ management forecasts, which also are forward-looking. In a difference-in-differences setting of gradual implementations of the ELM worldwide, we find that banks enhance management forecasts after adopting the future-oriented provisioning model, as manifested in higher likelihood of forecast issuance, higher frequency of forecasts, more precise forecasts, and higher overall forecast quality. This forecast-enhancing effect is more prominent when accounting standards are more strictly enforced, when banks experience larger changes in loss allowance after ELM implementation, and when forecasting is more challenging such as during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, banks’ post-ELM forecasting performance also improves in terms of greater forecast accuracy and persistency. Overall, our results suggest a complementary relation between expected loss recognition and banks’ management forecasts.
Original languageEnglish
Article number107369
JournalJournal of Accounting and Public Policy
Volume54
Early online date8 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Inc.

Funding

Chong Wang acknowledges financial support from the General Research Fund (#15509321) provided by the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong. Feng (Harry) Wu acknowledges financial support from the Department of Accountancy, Lingnan University.

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Difference-in-differences
  • Expected loss recognition
  • Management forecasts

Cite this