This paper examines the effects of several factors, including performance, on attitudes toward high executive pay. We ask: would people agree on whether a CEO’s pay is too high or too low, fair or unfair, and right or wrong, if they could be more certain than typically possible regarding a CEO’s relevant contributions? Using data from a population-based survey experiment (N = 1,170), we find that the effects of a CEO’s inputs are small next to the effects of predispositions (e.g. core values people bring to the issue), with implications for how pay at the top is justified.
Bibliographical noteThis research was fully supported by an Early Career Scheme (ECS) grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [Funding Reference No: LU 23601615].
- Income inequality
- distributive justice