Explaining variation in perceptions of red tape: A professionalism-marketization model

Gene A. BREWER*, Richard M. WALKER

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the public administration literature, ways in which perceptions of red tape vary between different parts of the public sector remains relatively unexplored. In this article we define organizational red tape as a subject-dependent concept; that is, we expect to see variations in the level and type of red tape between different internal stakeholder groups. We then explain variations with two organizational-based variables, professionalization and marketization. The empirical analysis is undertaken on nearly 800 English local government services. The framework correctly predicts that officials in highly professionalized and marketized services perceive higher levels of red tape, while those in less professionalized and marketized services report lower levels. We then summarize our findings and comment on their theoretical and practical significance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)418-438
Number of pages21
JournalPublic Administration
Volume88
Issue number2
Early online date10 Jun 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

The data in this article come from a study funded by the then Department of the Deputy Prime Minister in the UK. We would like to thank the reviewers for their insightful comments. All interpretations rest with the authors.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining variation in perceptions of red tape: A professionalism-marketization model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this