Abstract
It is plausible that time of birth affects one's prospects for wellbeing. Being born during a war or recession might have a negative impact on early life and lifetime wellbeing. In natural reproduction, delaying conception does not result in the same child being born later, but rather a different child altogether; therefore, prospective parents cannot harm/benefit their children by choosing their time of birth. However, we argue that for prospective parents undergoing the IVF process, things are different. Since it is possible to freeze and store embryos indefinitely before implantation, parents can choose their child's time of birth. Because certain birth timings may better support wellbeing, this introduces the possibility of repro-timing harms and benefits. This paper explores this new concept by outlining its theoretical assumptions and examining the moral reasons prospective parents in IVF might have for delaying implantation in the short, medium, and long term.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 201-210 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Bioethics |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 27 Oct 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s). Bioethics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Funding
Open access publishing facilitated by Consiglio Nazionale delle Ri-cerche, as part of the Wiley ‐ CRUI‐CARE agreement.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- embryo cryopreservation
- in vitro fertilization
- person-affecting views
- procreative ethics
- Population Ethics
- repro-timing harm and benefit
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring Repro-Timing Harm and Benefit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver