Projects per year
Abstract
Mark Schroeder’s expressivist program has made substantial progress in providing a compositional semantics for normative terms. This paper argues that it risks achieving this semantic progress at the cost of abandoning a key theoretical motivation for embracing expressivism in the first place. The problem can be summarized as a dilemma. Either Schroeder must allow that there are cases in which agents are in disagreement with one another, or can make valid inferences, but that these disagreements or inferences are not expressible in natural language; or his version of expressivism must abandon one of the key theoretical advantages expressivist theories seemed to possess over cognitivism, the ability to provide a very straightforward explanation of the action- and attitude-guiding role of normative judgments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 829-852 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Erkenntnis |
Volume | 83 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 7 Jul 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Thanks to Jack Woods and anonymous referees for extensive comments and criticism.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Expression and guidance in Schroeder’s expressivist semantics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Autonomy as Self-Interpretation (作為自我詮釋之自主性)
BAKER, D. C. (PI)
Research Grants Council (HKSAR)
1/01/13 → 31/12/14
Project: Grant Research