Extensive philosophical agreement and progress

Bryan FRANCES

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

1 Scopus Citations

Abstract

This article argues, first, that there is plenty of agreement among philosophers on philosophically substantive claims, which fall into three categories: reasons for or against certain views, elementary truths regarding fundamental notions, and highly conditionalized claims. This agreement suggests that there is important philosophical progress. It then argues that although it's easy to list several potential kinds of philosophical progress, it is much harder to determine whether the potential is actual. Then the article attempts to articulate the truth that the deniers of philosophical progress are latching on to. Finally, it comments on the significance of the agreement and (potential) progress.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-57
Number of pages11
JournalMetaphilosophy
Volume48
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Fundamental
Philosopher

Keywords

  • agreement
  • disagreement
  • expertise
  • metaphilosophy
  • philosophical progress
  • scientific progress

Cite this

FRANCES, Bryan. / Extensive philosophical agreement and progress. In: Metaphilosophy. 2017 ; Vol. 48, No. 1-2. pp. 47-57.
@article{b6879aa5dafc42a1a1d21e7affc92df7,
title = "Extensive philosophical agreement and progress",
abstract = "This article argues, first, that there is plenty of agreement among philosophers on philosophically substantive claims, which fall into three categories: reasons for or against certain views, elementary truths regarding fundamental notions, and highly conditionalized claims. This agreement suggests that there is important philosophical progress. It then argues that although it's easy to list several potential kinds of philosophical progress, it is much harder to determine whether the potential is actual. Then the article attempts to articulate the truth that the deniers of philosophical progress are latching on to. Finally, it comments on the significance of the agreement and (potential) progress.",
keywords = "agreement, disagreement, expertise, metaphilosophy, philosophical progress, scientific progress",
author = "Bryan FRANCES",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/meta.12227",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "47--57",
journal = "Metaphilosophy",
issn = "0026-1068",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "1-2",

}

Extensive philosophical agreement and progress. / FRANCES, Bryan.

In: Metaphilosophy, Vol. 48, No. 1-2, 01.01.2017, p. 47-57.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extensive philosophical agreement and progress

AU - FRANCES, Bryan

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This article argues, first, that there is plenty of agreement among philosophers on philosophically substantive claims, which fall into three categories: reasons for or against certain views, elementary truths regarding fundamental notions, and highly conditionalized claims. This agreement suggests that there is important philosophical progress. It then argues that although it's easy to list several potential kinds of philosophical progress, it is much harder to determine whether the potential is actual. Then the article attempts to articulate the truth that the deniers of philosophical progress are latching on to. Finally, it comments on the significance of the agreement and (potential) progress.

AB - This article argues, first, that there is plenty of agreement among philosophers on philosophically substantive claims, which fall into three categories: reasons for or against certain views, elementary truths regarding fundamental notions, and highly conditionalized claims. This agreement suggests that there is important philosophical progress. It then argues that although it's easy to list several potential kinds of philosophical progress, it is much harder to determine whether the potential is actual. Then the article attempts to articulate the truth that the deniers of philosophical progress are latching on to. Finally, it comments on the significance of the agreement and (potential) progress.

KW - agreement

KW - disagreement

KW - expertise

KW - metaphilosophy

KW - philosophical progress

KW - scientific progress

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6731

U2 - 10.1111/meta.12227

DO - 10.1111/meta.12227

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 48

SP - 47

EP - 57

JO - Metaphilosophy

JF - Metaphilosophy

SN - 0026-1068

IS - 1-2

ER -