Fictional objects, non-existence, and the principle of characterization

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I advance an objection to Graham Priest’s account of fictional entities as nonexistent objects. According to Priest, fictional characters do not have, in our world, the properties they are represented as having; for example, the property of being a bank clerk is possessed by Joseph K. not in our world but in other worlds. Priest claims that, in this way, his theory can include an unrestricted principle of characterization for objects. Now, some representational properties attributed to fictional characters, a kind of fictional entities, involve a crucial reference to the world in which they are supposed to be instantiated. I argue that these representational properties are problematic for Priest’s theory and that he cannot accept an unrestricted version of the principle of characterization. Thus, while not refuting Priest’s theory, I show that it is no better off than other Meinongian theories.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)139-146
Number of pages8
JournalPhilosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition
Volume159
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2012

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Fiction
  • Fictional objects
  • Graham priest
  • Non-existence
  • Noneism
  • Possible worlds
  • Principle of characterization

Cite this