Projects per year
Abstract
Following the first coronavirus case reported to the World Health Organization in Wuhan in 2019 and the ensuing city-wide lockdown that was imposed, many people attempted to leave the city, culminating in a vigorous discourse on the dominant Chinese microblogging site, Weibo. This study seeks to examine how online participants discursively delegitimated and legitimated people who left Wuhan before the lockdown. Weibo posts with the hashtag #逃离武汉 (‘Fleeing Wuhan’) were collected, and delegitimation and legitimation strategies deployed by users were identified. My findings reveal that the delegitimators exploited moral evaluation and impersonal authority to highlight the construed unethicality and shamelessness of people who left Wuhan, whereas the legitimators used an array of strategies, including explanation and definition, to normalize their intentions and counter linguistic hostility. These findings also provide implications vis-à-vis the clustering of delegitimation strategies as well as their linkages with emotional appeals in online discourse.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | amac061 |
Pages (from-to) | 391-419 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Applied Linguistics |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 21 Nov 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) (2022). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Funding
This work was supported by the Faculty Research Grant, Lingnan University: [Grant Number 101884].
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '#FleeingWuhan : Legitimation and Delegitimation Strategies in Hostile Online Discourse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished