Four stories in one : environmental protection and rural reconstruction in China

Tiejun WEN, Kin Chi LAU

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Within China, evaluating the experiences of the reform since 1978 is a hot topic among intellectuals. However, the economic theories in today’s China are almost all imported from abroad and cannot adequately explain China’s economic development. The author, having been long engaged in grassroots research work, tells four cautionary stories in order to expound on the question of the institutional cost induced by the “rural-urban dichotomy” and the fundamental systemic contradictions in China, as well as to discuss the rural reconstruction efforts that he has embarked on as an endeavor to resolve the systemic contradictions. Story 1. The Story of the Zapatistas, the Masked Army: how the indigenous Indians have changed their ancient tradition of living in harmony with nature and are now “destroying” nature in order to farm and subsist. Story 2. The Story of the “Straw-Hat Plot of Land”: how the poor peasants in Guizhou Province in southwest China are compelled to farm on steep slopes, showing that China does not have an overall strategy that takes care of the nation’s environmental protection and sustainable development. Story 3. The Story of “Enclosures”: how the grave traffic jams and air pollution in Beijing partly stem from a monopoly by the authorities over land and capital. Story 4. The Story of Disease from Food: how food security is compromised with the excessive use of pesticide, chemical fertilizer, and heavy metal in farming and husbandry. From the four cautionary stories is derived the Story of Rural Reconstruction, which the author has been engaged in, together with many volunteers, and which works for the integration of environmental protection and the reconstruction of rural culture. As Western-style modernization is not appropriate for China, which is superpopulous with extremely scarce resources, Chinese peasants should revive traditional patterns of small peasantry in growing grain and raising pigs at the same time and use natural energy conducive to environmental protection. Peasants should also organize themselves and, through collective effort and cooperative labor, transform human resources into social capital and use the surplus rural labor for changing the conditions of the villages. The James Yen Rural Reconstruction Institute (YIRR), set up in a village in Hebei Province, of which the author is the director, has been an experiment on self-reliant ways of development through the contribution of volunteers and villagers. Their production and daily life have been environmentally friendly, ecologically sound, and organically cyclical, in pursuit of sustainability.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)491-505
    Number of pages15
    JournalPositions: Asia Critique
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2008

    Fingerprint

    environmental protection
    reconstruction
    China
    peasant
    farm
    village
    labor
    food
    air pollution
    Environmental Protection
    economic theory
    monopoly
    intellectual
    human resources
    agricultural product
    social capital
    military
    director
    modernization
    sustainable development

    Bibliographical note

    Prof. Lau Kin-chi is the translator of this essay.
    This essay is based on a speech delivered by the author at the First Green China Forum, on
    October 25, 2003, in Beijing. Before its translation into English in January 2008, the author made some revisions based on the developments of the last four years.

    Cite this

    @article{ac77186c9f044df0b7b370b902728d95,
    title = "Four stories in one : environmental protection and rural reconstruction in China",
    abstract = "Within China, evaluating the experiences of the reform since 1978 is a hot topic among intellectuals. However, the economic theories in today’s China are almost all imported from abroad and cannot adequately explain China’s economic development. The author, having been long engaged in grassroots research work, tells four cautionary stories in order to expound on the question of the institutional cost induced by the “rural-urban dichotomy” and the fundamental systemic contradictions in China, as well as to discuss the rural reconstruction efforts that he has embarked on as an endeavor to resolve the systemic contradictions. Story 1. The Story of the Zapatistas, the Masked Army: how the indigenous Indians have changed their ancient tradition of living in harmony with nature and are now “destroying” nature in order to farm and subsist. Story 2. The Story of the “Straw-Hat Plot of Land”: how the poor peasants in Guizhou Province in southwest China are compelled to farm on steep slopes, showing that China does not have an overall strategy that takes care of the nation’s environmental protection and sustainable development. Story 3. The Story of “Enclosures”: how the grave traffic jams and air pollution in Beijing partly stem from a monopoly by the authorities over land and capital. Story 4. The Story of Disease from Food: how food security is compromised with the excessive use of pesticide, chemical fertilizer, and heavy metal in farming and husbandry. From the four cautionary stories is derived the Story of Rural Reconstruction, which the author has been engaged in, together with many volunteers, and which works for the integration of environmental protection and the reconstruction of rural culture. As Western-style modernization is not appropriate for China, which is superpopulous with extremely scarce resources, Chinese peasants should revive traditional patterns of small peasantry in growing grain and raising pigs at the same time and use natural energy conducive to environmental protection. Peasants should also organize themselves and, through collective effort and cooperative labor, transform human resources into social capital and use the surplus rural labor for changing the conditions of the villages. The James Yen Rural Reconstruction Institute (YIRR), set up in a village in Hebei Province, of which the author is the director, has been an experiment on self-reliant ways of development through the contribution of volunteers and villagers. Their production and daily life have been environmentally friendly, ecologically sound, and organically cyclical, in pursuit of sustainability.",
    author = "Tiejun WEN and LAU, {Kin Chi}",
    note = "Prof. Lau Kin-chi is the translator of this essay. This essay is based on a speech delivered by the author at the First Green China Forum, on October 25, 2003, in Beijing. Before its translation into English in January 2008, the author made some revisions based on the developments of the last four years.",
    year = "2008",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1215/10679847-2008-011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "491--505",
    journal = "Information and Software Technology",
    issn = "1067-9847",
    publisher = "Duke University Press",
    number = "3",

    }

    Four stories in one : environmental protection and rural reconstruction in China. / WEN, Tiejun; LAU, Kin Chi.

    In: Positions: Asia Critique, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.01.2008, p. 491-505.

    Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Four stories in one : environmental protection and rural reconstruction in China

    AU - WEN, Tiejun

    AU - LAU, Kin Chi

    N1 - Prof. Lau Kin-chi is the translator of this essay. This essay is based on a speech delivered by the author at the First Green China Forum, on October 25, 2003, in Beijing. Before its translation into English in January 2008, the author made some revisions based on the developments of the last four years.

    PY - 2008/1/1

    Y1 - 2008/1/1

    N2 - Within China, evaluating the experiences of the reform since 1978 is a hot topic among intellectuals. However, the economic theories in today’s China are almost all imported from abroad and cannot adequately explain China’s economic development. The author, having been long engaged in grassroots research work, tells four cautionary stories in order to expound on the question of the institutional cost induced by the “rural-urban dichotomy” and the fundamental systemic contradictions in China, as well as to discuss the rural reconstruction efforts that he has embarked on as an endeavor to resolve the systemic contradictions. Story 1. The Story of the Zapatistas, the Masked Army: how the indigenous Indians have changed their ancient tradition of living in harmony with nature and are now “destroying” nature in order to farm and subsist. Story 2. The Story of the “Straw-Hat Plot of Land”: how the poor peasants in Guizhou Province in southwest China are compelled to farm on steep slopes, showing that China does not have an overall strategy that takes care of the nation’s environmental protection and sustainable development. Story 3. The Story of “Enclosures”: how the grave traffic jams and air pollution in Beijing partly stem from a monopoly by the authorities over land and capital. Story 4. The Story of Disease from Food: how food security is compromised with the excessive use of pesticide, chemical fertilizer, and heavy metal in farming and husbandry. From the four cautionary stories is derived the Story of Rural Reconstruction, which the author has been engaged in, together with many volunteers, and which works for the integration of environmental protection and the reconstruction of rural culture. As Western-style modernization is not appropriate for China, which is superpopulous with extremely scarce resources, Chinese peasants should revive traditional patterns of small peasantry in growing grain and raising pigs at the same time and use natural energy conducive to environmental protection. Peasants should also organize themselves and, through collective effort and cooperative labor, transform human resources into social capital and use the surplus rural labor for changing the conditions of the villages. The James Yen Rural Reconstruction Institute (YIRR), set up in a village in Hebei Province, of which the author is the director, has been an experiment on self-reliant ways of development through the contribution of volunteers and villagers. Their production and daily life have been environmentally friendly, ecologically sound, and organically cyclical, in pursuit of sustainability.

    AB - Within China, evaluating the experiences of the reform since 1978 is a hot topic among intellectuals. However, the economic theories in today’s China are almost all imported from abroad and cannot adequately explain China’s economic development. The author, having been long engaged in grassroots research work, tells four cautionary stories in order to expound on the question of the institutional cost induced by the “rural-urban dichotomy” and the fundamental systemic contradictions in China, as well as to discuss the rural reconstruction efforts that he has embarked on as an endeavor to resolve the systemic contradictions. Story 1. The Story of the Zapatistas, the Masked Army: how the indigenous Indians have changed their ancient tradition of living in harmony with nature and are now “destroying” nature in order to farm and subsist. Story 2. The Story of the “Straw-Hat Plot of Land”: how the poor peasants in Guizhou Province in southwest China are compelled to farm on steep slopes, showing that China does not have an overall strategy that takes care of the nation’s environmental protection and sustainable development. Story 3. The Story of “Enclosures”: how the grave traffic jams and air pollution in Beijing partly stem from a monopoly by the authorities over land and capital. Story 4. The Story of Disease from Food: how food security is compromised with the excessive use of pesticide, chemical fertilizer, and heavy metal in farming and husbandry. From the four cautionary stories is derived the Story of Rural Reconstruction, which the author has been engaged in, together with many volunteers, and which works for the integration of environmental protection and the reconstruction of rural culture. As Western-style modernization is not appropriate for China, which is superpopulous with extremely scarce resources, Chinese peasants should revive traditional patterns of small peasantry in growing grain and raising pigs at the same time and use natural energy conducive to environmental protection. Peasants should also organize themselves and, through collective effort and cooperative labor, transform human resources into social capital and use the surplus rural labor for changing the conditions of the villages. The James Yen Rural Reconstruction Institute (YIRR), set up in a village in Hebei Province, of which the author is the director, has been an experiment on self-reliant ways of development through the contribution of volunteers and villagers. Their production and daily life have been environmentally friendly, ecologically sound, and organically cyclical, in pursuit of sustainability.

    UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/3623

    U2 - 10.1215/10679847-2008-011

    DO - 10.1215/10679847-2008-011

    M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

    VL - 16

    SP - 491

    EP - 505

    JO - Information and Software Technology

    JF - Information and Software Technology

    SN - 1067-9847

    IS - 3

    ER -