Abstract
Almost all analyses of time complexity of evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have been conducted for (1 + 1) EAs only. Theoretical results on the average computation time of population-based EAs are few. However, the vast majority of applications of EAs use a population size that is greater than one. The use of population has been regarded as one of the key features of EAs. It is important to understand in depth what the real utility of population is in terms of the time complexity of EAs, when EAs are applied to combinatorial optimization problems. This paper compares (1 + 1) EAs and (N + N) EAs theoretically by deriving their first hitting time on the same problems. It is shown that a population can have a drastic impact on an EA's average computation time, changing an exponential time to a polynomial time (in the input size) in some cases. It is also shown that the first hitting probability can be improved by introducing a population. However, the results presented in this paper do not imply that population-based EAs will always be better than (1 + 1) EAs for all possible problems.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 495-511 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2002 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
This work was supported in part by an EPSRC Grant (GR/R52541/01) and by the State Key Lab of Software Engineering, Wuhan University.Keywords
- Evolutionary algorithms
- First hitting time
- Population
- Time complexity