From infrastructural breakdown to data vandalism : repoliticizing the smart city ?

Rolien HOYNG

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The smart city is often approached by its critics as a “system” that exploits optimal connectivity and efficiency for an urban society of control. Meanwhile, the actual operation of “smart city” assemblages in globalizing cities—characterized by development and breakdown, connectivity and disconnection—is seldom the basis of analysis. By focusing on the interplays between these dualities, this article aims to underscore the modalities of power and political possibilities of dissent in Istanbul, Turkey. Data-based smart city apparatuses are supposed to at once fix infrastructural breakdown and stabilize the socio-political order. However, during the Gezi protests of 2013, the integrated tactics of sabotage in urban space and data vandalism in the digital realm undermined both data control by the state and its political authority. Yet Gezi’s example also shows that hyperconnectivity, data motility, and virality by themselves do not necessarily lead to more meaningful participation in urban politics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)397-415
Number of pages19
JournalTelevision and New Media
Volume17
Issue number5
Early online date2 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

vandalism
sabotage
tactics
protest
critic
Turkey
efficiency
participation
politics
Vandalism
Connectivity

Keywords

  • Istanbul
  • data
  • participation
  • protest
  • smart city
  • social media

Cite this

@article{dfec4680d4ac479699b8377964c2ed72,
title = "From infrastructural breakdown to data vandalism : repoliticizing the smart city ?",
abstract = "The smart city is often approached by its critics as a “system” that exploits optimal connectivity and efficiency for an urban society of control. Meanwhile, the actual operation of “smart city” assemblages in globalizing cities—characterized by development and breakdown, connectivity and disconnection—is seldom the basis of analysis. By focusing on the interplays between these dualities, this article aims to underscore the modalities of power and political possibilities of dissent in Istanbul, Turkey. Data-based smart city apparatuses are supposed to at once fix infrastructural breakdown and stabilize the socio-political order. However, during the Gezi protests of 2013, the integrated tactics of sabotage in urban space and data vandalism in the digital realm undermined both data control by the state and its political authority. Yet Gezi’s example also shows that hyperconnectivity, data motility, and virality by themselves do not necessarily lead to more meaningful participation in urban politics.",
keywords = "Istanbul, data, participation, protest, smart city, social media",
author = "Rolien HOYNG",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1527476415617032",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "397--415",
journal = "Television and New Media",
issn = "1527-4764",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

From infrastructural breakdown to data vandalism : repoliticizing the smart city ? / HOYNG, Rolien.

In: Television and New Media, Vol. 17, No. 5, 01.07.2016, p. 397-415.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - From infrastructural breakdown to data vandalism : repoliticizing the smart city ?

AU - HOYNG, Rolien

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - The smart city is often approached by its critics as a “system” that exploits optimal connectivity and efficiency for an urban society of control. Meanwhile, the actual operation of “smart city” assemblages in globalizing cities—characterized by development and breakdown, connectivity and disconnection—is seldom the basis of analysis. By focusing on the interplays between these dualities, this article aims to underscore the modalities of power and political possibilities of dissent in Istanbul, Turkey. Data-based smart city apparatuses are supposed to at once fix infrastructural breakdown and stabilize the socio-political order. However, during the Gezi protests of 2013, the integrated tactics of sabotage in urban space and data vandalism in the digital realm undermined both data control by the state and its political authority. Yet Gezi’s example also shows that hyperconnectivity, data motility, and virality by themselves do not necessarily lead to more meaningful participation in urban politics.

AB - The smart city is often approached by its critics as a “system” that exploits optimal connectivity and efficiency for an urban society of control. Meanwhile, the actual operation of “smart city” assemblages in globalizing cities—characterized by development and breakdown, connectivity and disconnection—is seldom the basis of analysis. By focusing on the interplays between these dualities, this article aims to underscore the modalities of power and political possibilities of dissent in Istanbul, Turkey. Data-based smart city apparatuses are supposed to at once fix infrastructural breakdown and stabilize the socio-political order. However, during the Gezi protests of 2013, the integrated tactics of sabotage in urban space and data vandalism in the digital realm undermined both data control by the state and its political authority. Yet Gezi’s example also shows that hyperconnectivity, data motility, and virality by themselves do not necessarily lead to more meaningful participation in urban politics.

KW - Istanbul

KW - data

KW - participation

KW - protest

KW - smart city

KW - social media

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/4808

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84977117339&doi=10.1177%2f1527476415617032&partnerID=40&md5=8199326e10275b9c8b699423f9d68746

U2 - 10.1177/1527476415617032

DO - 10.1177/1527476415617032

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 17

SP - 397

EP - 415

JO - Television and New Media

JF - Television and New Media

SN - 1527-4764

IS - 5

ER -