Abstract
The smart city is often approached by its critics as a “system” that exploits optimal connectivity and efficiency for an urban society of control. Meanwhile, the actual operation of “smart city” assemblages in globalizing cities—characterized by development and breakdown, connectivity and disconnection—is seldom the basis of analysis. By focusing on the interplays between these dualities, this article aims to underscore the modalities of power and political possibilities of dissent in Istanbul, Turkey. Data-based smart city apparatuses are supposed to at once fix infrastructural breakdown and stabilize the socio-political order. However, during the Gezi protests of 2013, the integrated tactics of sabotage in urban space and data vandalism in the digital realm undermined both data control by the state and its political authority. Yet Gezi’s example also shows that hyperconnectivity, data motility, and virality by themselves do not necessarily lead to more meaningful participation in urban politics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 397-415 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Television and New Media |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 2 Dec 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Istanbul
- data
- participation
- protest
- smart city
- social media
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From infrastructural breakdown to data vandalism : repoliticizing the smart city ?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver