From the headscarf to the burqa : the role of social theorists in shaping laws against the veil

Peter BAEHR, Daniel GORDON

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Opposition to the burqa is widespread in Europe but not in the United States. What explains the difference? Focusing primarily on the French case and its Belgian facsimile, we seek to underscore the role of social theorists in legitimizing bans on the full veil. Ironically, this role has been largely disregarded by Anglophone theorists who write on the veil, and who often oppose its prohibition. This article suggests that Europe tends to be more repressive towards full veils because its political process is more open to multiple theoretical representations of the phenomenon of veiling. Conversely, the United States is more open to the provocative display of religious symbols in public because the political process is pre-structured by legal conventions that tend to filter out social theory. The push to ban the burqa in France principally derives from its brand of republicanism rather than being a product of racism and Islamophobia. Of particular significance in the French case is the emphasis on reciprocity as a political principle, a principle that is elongated into an ideal of sociability by French theorists in different disciplines. The arguments of these theorists are described, their rationale is explained and the impact of their intervention on the policy process is documented. The French case, where the popular press and legislature play a major role in shaping policy towards the burqa, is contrasted with that of the United States, where the judiciary, defending religious freedom, remains the most influential collective actor. Each country has correspondingly different attitudes to democracy. In France, the mission of democracy is to extend political equality to the social realm whereas in the United States it is religion that is prioritized so as to protect that which is deemed most sacred to the individual.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-280
Number of pages32
JournalEconomy and Society
Volume42
Issue number2
Early online date5 Mar 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

ban
Law
France
democracy
popular press
republicanism
religious freedom
sociability
judiciary
Belgian
reciprocity
racism
equality
symbol
opposition
Religion
Veil
Headscarf
Theorists
Democracy

Keywords

  • burqa
  • deflection of theory
  • elongation of the political
  • headscarf
  • law
  • reciprocity
  • sociability
  • veil

Cite this

@article{a9e3f9307a834a9983766ce999e16f51,
title = "From the headscarf to the burqa : the role of social theorists in shaping laws against the veil",
abstract = "Opposition to the burqa is widespread in Europe but not in the United States. What explains the difference? Focusing primarily on the French case and its Belgian facsimile, we seek to underscore the role of social theorists in legitimizing bans on the full veil. Ironically, this role has been largely disregarded by Anglophone theorists who write on the veil, and who often oppose its prohibition. This article suggests that Europe tends to be more repressive towards full veils because its political process is more open to multiple theoretical representations of the phenomenon of veiling. Conversely, the United States is more open to the provocative display of religious symbols in public because the political process is pre-structured by legal conventions that tend to filter out social theory. The push to ban the burqa in France principally derives from its brand of republicanism rather than being a product of racism and Islamophobia. Of particular significance in the French case is the emphasis on reciprocity as a political principle, a principle that is elongated into an ideal of sociability by French theorists in different disciplines. The arguments of these theorists are described, their rationale is explained and the impact of their intervention on the policy process is documented. The French case, where the popular press and legislature play a major role in shaping policy towards the burqa, is contrasted with that of the United States, where the judiciary, defending religious freedom, remains the most influential collective actor. Each country has correspondingly different attitudes to democracy. In France, the mission of democracy is to extend political equality to the social realm whereas in the United States it is religion that is prioritized so as to protect that which is deemed most sacred to the individual.",
keywords = "burqa, deflection of theory, elongation of the political, headscarf, law, reciprocity, sociability, veil",
author = "Peter BAEHR and Daniel GORDON",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/03085147.2012.718620",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "249--280",
journal = "Economy and Society",
issn = "0308-5147",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

From the headscarf to the burqa : the role of social theorists in shaping laws against the veil. / BAEHR, Peter; GORDON, Daniel.

In: Economy and Society, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2013, p. 249-280.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - From the headscarf to the burqa : the role of social theorists in shaping laws against the veil

AU - BAEHR, Peter

AU - GORDON, Daniel

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Opposition to the burqa is widespread in Europe but not in the United States. What explains the difference? Focusing primarily on the French case and its Belgian facsimile, we seek to underscore the role of social theorists in legitimizing bans on the full veil. Ironically, this role has been largely disregarded by Anglophone theorists who write on the veil, and who often oppose its prohibition. This article suggests that Europe tends to be more repressive towards full veils because its political process is more open to multiple theoretical representations of the phenomenon of veiling. Conversely, the United States is more open to the provocative display of religious symbols in public because the political process is pre-structured by legal conventions that tend to filter out social theory. The push to ban the burqa in France principally derives from its brand of republicanism rather than being a product of racism and Islamophobia. Of particular significance in the French case is the emphasis on reciprocity as a political principle, a principle that is elongated into an ideal of sociability by French theorists in different disciplines. The arguments of these theorists are described, their rationale is explained and the impact of their intervention on the policy process is documented. The French case, where the popular press and legislature play a major role in shaping policy towards the burqa, is contrasted with that of the United States, where the judiciary, defending religious freedom, remains the most influential collective actor. Each country has correspondingly different attitudes to democracy. In France, the mission of democracy is to extend political equality to the social realm whereas in the United States it is religion that is prioritized so as to protect that which is deemed most sacred to the individual.

AB - Opposition to the burqa is widespread in Europe but not in the United States. What explains the difference? Focusing primarily on the French case and its Belgian facsimile, we seek to underscore the role of social theorists in legitimizing bans on the full veil. Ironically, this role has been largely disregarded by Anglophone theorists who write on the veil, and who often oppose its prohibition. This article suggests that Europe tends to be more repressive towards full veils because its political process is more open to multiple theoretical representations of the phenomenon of veiling. Conversely, the United States is more open to the provocative display of religious symbols in public because the political process is pre-structured by legal conventions that tend to filter out social theory. The push to ban the burqa in France principally derives from its brand of republicanism rather than being a product of racism and Islamophobia. Of particular significance in the French case is the emphasis on reciprocity as a political principle, a principle that is elongated into an ideal of sociability by French theorists in different disciplines. The arguments of these theorists are described, their rationale is explained and the impact of their intervention on the policy process is documented. The French case, where the popular press and legislature play a major role in shaping policy towards the burqa, is contrasted with that of the United States, where the judiciary, defending religious freedom, remains the most influential collective actor. Each country has correspondingly different attitudes to democracy. In France, the mission of democracy is to extend political equality to the social realm whereas in the United States it is religion that is prioritized so as to protect that which is deemed most sacred to the individual.

KW - burqa

KW - deflection of theory

KW - elongation of the political

KW - headscarf

KW - law

KW - reciprocity

KW - sociability

KW - veil

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2555

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84875366954&doi=10.1080%2f03085147.2012.718620&partnerID=40&md5=1bf40fff7ccc9ac250e9bba77f8c4a92

U2 - 10.1080/03085147.2012.718620

DO - 10.1080/03085147.2012.718620

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 42

SP - 249

EP - 280

JO - Economy and Society

JF - Economy and Society

SN - 0308-5147

IS - 2

ER -