Gandhian communalism and the midnight children's conference

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many Rushdie scholars call Midnight's Children the political reawakening of Indian English fiction. The story begins with the gestation of the Indian English novel during the movement for independence, when "there was an urgency to foreground the idea of a composite nation." After 1947 comes a period of atrophy, as the nation-building that was the source of the genre's power now becomes an "ideological straitjacket." According to Gayatri Spivak, "reportorial realist writers" depicted the "miniaturised world of a nostalgia," as political independence set them "adrift, away from the current from which the post-colonial monstrous would emerge." In Bishnupriya Ghosh's view, novelists made "essentializing and homogenizing gestures" in an alignment with a statist project, "the Nehruvian vision of a modern and progressive India when there was a dire need to establish common national registers and field[s] of communication." Then Midnight's Children explodes over Bombay in 1981, its Emergency-induced gloom counterbalanced by an invigorating cultural eclecticism and spirit of political critique. For Meenakshi Mukherjee, the novel's vision of an "inclusive and tolerant" polity clarifies a set of public ideals for a socially diverse nation, while Michael Gorra claims that "no one else has so fully used [English] to probe the nature of [Indian] national identity or to define a model for [End Page 975] the postcolonial self." Midnight's Children inaugurates a renaissance for Indian English fiction, a development that is codified by Rushdie's own coedited anthology of post-1947 writing. My essay argues for an inversion of this narrative: Midnight's Children can be seen as a foreclosure of possibilities, erasing alternative models of the Indian nation. Although Saleem Sinai characterizes his writing as a restorative for an "amnesiac nation," Midnight's Children has itself created a kind of literary-political amnesia, either blotting out the work of earlier writers or encouraging critics to read their work in the light of developments after 1981.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)975-1016
Number of pages42
JournalELH
Volume72
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Communalism
Midnight's Children
Indian English
Fiction
Writer
English Novel
Alternative Possibilities
Communication
Emergency
Polity
India
Alignment
Gayatri Spivak
Novelist
Sinai
National Identity
Monstrous
Novel
Eclecticism
Amnesia

Cite this

@article{bef3fce17e1d4753a2be21df1e9e1f41,
title = "Gandhian communalism and the midnight children's conference",
abstract = "Many Rushdie scholars call Midnight's Children the political reawakening of Indian English fiction. The story begins with the gestation of the Indian English novel during the movement for independence, when {"}there was an urgency to foreground the idea of a composite nation.{"} After 1947 comes a period of atrophy, as the nation-building that was the source of the genre's power now becomes an {"}ideological straitjacket.{"} According to Gayatri Spivak, {"}reportorial realist writers{"} depicted the {"}miniaturised world of a nostalgia,{"} as political independence set them {"}adrift, away from the current from which the post-colonial monstrous would emerge.{"} In Bishnupriya Ghosh's view, novelists made {"}essentializing and homogenizing gestures{"} in an alignment with a statist project, {"}the Nehruvian vision of a modern and progressive India when there was a dire need to establish common national registers and field[s] of communication.{"} Then Midnight's Children explodes over Bombay in 1981, its Emergency-induced gloom counterbalanced by an invigorating cultural eclecticism and spirit of political critique. For Meenakshi Mukherjee, the novel's vision of an {"}inclusive and tolerant{"} polity clarifies a set of public ideals for a socially diverse nation, while Michael Gorra claims that {"}no one else has so fully used [English] to probe the nature of [Indian] national identity or to define a model for [End Page 975] the postcolonial self.{"} Midnight's Children inaugurates a renaissance for Indian English fiction, a development that is codified by Rushdie's own coedited anthology of post-1947 writing. My essay argues for an inversion of this narrative: Midnight's Children can be seen as a foreclosure of possibilities, erasing alternative models of the Indian nation. Although Saleem Sinai characterizes his writing as a restorative for an {"}amnesiac nation,{"} Midnight's Children has itself created a kind of literary-political amnesia, either blotting out the work of earlier writers or encouraging critics to read their work in the light of developments after 1981.",
author = "Eric STRAND",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/elh.2005.0038",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "975--1016",
journal = "ELH - English Literary History",
issn = "0013-8304",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "4",

}

Gandhian communalism and the midnight children's conference. / STRAND, Eric.

In: ELH, Vol. 72, No. 4, 01.01.2005, p. 975-1016.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gandhian communalism and the midnight children's conference

AU - STRAND, Eric

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Many Rushdie scholars call Midnight's Children the political reawakening of Indian English fiction. The story begins with the gestation of the Indian English novel during the movement for independence, when "there was an urgency to foreground the idea of a composite nation." After 1947 comes a period of atrophy, as the nation-building that was the source of the genre's power now becomes an "ideological straitjacket." According to Gayatri Spivak, "reportorial realist writers" depicted the "miniaturised world of a nostalgia," as political independence set them "adrift, away from the current from which the post-colonial monstrous would emerge." In Bishnupriya Ghosh's view, novelists made "essentializing and homogenizing gestures" in an alignment with a statist project, "the Nehruvian vision of a modern and progressive India when there was a dire need to establish common national registers and field[s] of communication." Then Midnight's Children explodes over Bombay in 1981, its Emergency-induced gloom counterbalanced by an invigorating cultural eclecticism and spirit of political critique. For Meenakshi Mukherjee, the novel's vision of an "inclusive and tolerant" polity clarifies a set of public ideals for a socially diverse nation, while Michael Gorra claims that "no one else has so fully used [English] to probe the nature of [Indian] national identity or to define a model for [End Page 975] the postcolonial self." Midnight's Children inaugurates a renaissance for Indian English fiction, a development that is codified by Rushdie's own coedited anthology of post-1947 writing. My essay argues for an inversion of this narrative: Midnight's Children can be seen as a foreclosure of possibilities, erasing alternative models of the Indian nation. Although Saleem Sinai characterizes his writing as a restorative for an "amnesiac nation," Midnight's Children has itself created a kind of literary-political amnesia, either blotting out the work of earlier writers or encouraging critics to read their work in the light of developments after 1981.

AB - Many Rushdie scholars call Midnight's Children the political reawakening of Indian English fiction. The story begins with the gestation of the Indian English novel during the movement for independence, when "there was an urgency to foreground the idea of a composite nation." After 1947 comes a period of atrophy, as the nation-building that was the source of the genre's power now becomes an "ideological straitjacket." According to Gayatri Spivak, "reportorial realist writers" depicted the "miniaturised world of a nostalgia," as political independence set them "adrift, away from the current from which the post-colonial monstrous would emerge." In Bishnupriya Ghosh's view, novelists made "essentializing and homogenizing gestures" in an alignment with a statist project, "the Nehruvian vision of a modern and progressive India when there was a dire need to establish common national registers and field[s] of communication." Then Midnight's Children explodes over Bombay in 1981, its Emergency-induced gloom counterbalanced by an invigorating cultural eclecticism and spirit of political critique. For Meenakshi Mukherjee, the novel's vision of an "inclusive and tolerant" polity clarifies a set of public ideals for a socially diverse nation, while Michael Gorra claims that "no one else has so fully used [English] to probe the nature of [Indian] national identity or to define a model for [End Page 975] the postcolonial self." Midnight's Children inaugurates a renaissance for Indian English fiction, a development that is codified by Rushdie's own coedited anthology of post-1947 writing. My essay argues for an inversion of this narrative: Midnight's Children can be seen as a foreclosure of possibilities, erasing alternative models of the Indian nation. Although Saleem Sinai characterizes his writing as a restorative for an "amnesiac nation," Midnight's Children has itself created a kind of literary-political amnesia, either blotting out the work of earlier writers or encouraging critics to read their work in the light of developments after 1981.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/4763

U2 - 10.1353/elh.2005.0038

DO - 10.1353/elh.2005.0038

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 72

SP - 975

EP - 1016

JO - ELH - English Literary History

JF - ELH - English Literary History

SN - 0013-8304

IS - 4

ER -