Government purchase of services in China : similar intentions, different policy designs

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

China has adopted purchase of services to facilitate the development of the societal sector, including social organisations, the social work profession and social services. Project-based and post-based purchases are two typical policy designs. Why do the local states develop two different designs to serve similar intentions? The answers to this question contribute to the broader discussion of policymaking and social development in China. Using the intention-capacity analytic framework, this study systemically compares Guangzhou's project-based model and Shenzhen's post-based model by drawing upon an extensive review of policy and archive documents, key informant interviews and field observations. The comparative study suggests that a pro-market ideology and incomplete analytical capacity in policy learning directed the design thinking towards market mechanism and purchase of services. Without the organisational conditions of social organisation and social work in Guangzhou, rapid growth in the social work workforce became the top priority in Shenzhen. Meanwhile, the trustworthiness of newly developing social organisations is another concern. All of these concerns underpinned the post-based design. Both models, with substantial fiscal support, succeed in expanding the societal sectors. But the mix of market and hierarchy tools, for the post-based model in particular, is an obstacle in further enabling social organisation and the social work profession.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-78
Number of pages14
JournalPublic Administration and Development
Volume37
Issue number1
Early online date15 Feb 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Fingerprint

social work
social organization
purchase
China
market
profession
market mechanism
trustworthiness
social development
ideology
mobile social services
comparative study
learning
services
policy
interview
project

Keywords

  • policy design
  • policy capacity
  • policy instrument
  • purchase of services
  • project-based and post-based models
  • China

Cite this

@article{448a0ad46235458c93e8ebb103c985b5,
title = "Government purchase of services in China : similar intentions, different policy designs",
abstract = "China has adopted purchase of services to facilitate the development of the societal sector, including social organisations, the social work profession and social services. Project-based and post-based purchases are two typical policy designs. Why do the local states develop two different designs to serve similar intentions? The answers to this question contribute to the broader discussion of policymaking and social development in China. Using the intention-capacity analytic framework, this study systemically compares Guangzhou's project-based model and Shenzhen's post-based model by drawing upon an extensive review of policy and archive documents, key informant interviews and field observations. The comparative study suggests that a pro-market ideology and incomplete analytical capacity in policy learning directed the design thinking towards market mechanism and purchase of services. Without the organisational conditions of social organisation and social work in Guangzhou, rapid growth in the social work workforce became the top priority in Shenzhen. Meanwhile, the trustworthiness of newly developing social organisations is another concern. All of these concerns underpinned the post-based design. Both models, with substantial fiscal support, succeed in expanding the societal sectors. But the mix of market and hierarchy tools, for the post-based model in particular, is an obstacle in further enabling social organisation and the social work profession.",
keywords = "policy design, policy capacity, policy instrument, purchase of services, project-based and post-based models, China",
author = "WEN, {Zhuoyi, Vincent}",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/pad.1792",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "65--78",
journal = "Public Administration and Development",
issn = "0271-2075",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Government purchase of services in China : similar intentions, different policy designs. / WEN, Zhuoyi, Vincent.

In: Public Administration and Development, Vol. 37, No. 1, 02.2017, p. 65-78.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Government purchase of services in China : similar intentions, different policy designs

AU - WEN, Zhuoyi, Vincent

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - China has adopted purchase of services to facilitate the development of the societal sector, including social organisations, the social work profession and social services. Project-based and post-based purchases are two typical policy designs. Why do the local states develop two different designs to serve similar intentions? The answers to this question contribute to the broader discussion of policymaking and social development in China. Using the intention-capacity analytic framework, this study systemically compares Guangzhou's project-based model and Shenzhen's post-based model by drawing upon an extensive review of policy and archive documents, key informant interviews and field observations. The comparative study suggests that a pro-market ideology and incomplete analytical capacity in policy learning directed the design thinking towards market mechanism and purchase of services. Without the organisational conditions of social organisation and social work in Guangzhou, rapid growth in the social work workforce became the top priority in Shenzhen. Meanwhile, the trustworthiness of newly developing social organisations is another concern. All of these concerns underpinned the post-based design. Both models, with substantial fiscal support, succeed in expanding the societal sectors. But the mix of market and hierarchy tools, for the post-based model in particular, is an obstacle in further enabling social organisation and the social work profession.

AB - China has adopted purchase of services to facilitate the development of the societal sector, including social organisations, the social work profession and social services. Project-based and post-based purchases are two typical policy designs. Why do the local states develop two different designs to serve similar intentions? The answers to this question contribute to the broader discussion of policymaking and social development in China. Using the intention-capacity analytic framework, this study systemically compares Guangzhou's project-based model and Shenzhen's post-based model by drawing upon an extensive review of policy and archive documents, key informant interviews and field observations. The comparative study suggests that a pro-market ideology and incomplete analytical capacity in policy learning directed the design thinking towards market mechanism and purchase of services. Without the organisational conditions of social organisation and social work in Guangzhou, rapid growth in the social work workforce became the top priority in Shenzhen. Meanwhile, the trustworthiness of newly developing social organisations is another concern. All of these concerns underpinned the post-based design. Both models, with substantial fiscal support, succeed in expanding the societal sectors. But the mix of market and hierarchy tools, for the post-based model in particular, is an obstacle in further enabling social organisation and the social work profession.

KW - policy design

KW - policy capacity

KW - policy instrument

KW - purchase of services

KW - project-based and post-based models

KW - China

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/5391

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85013029152&doi=10.1002%2fpad.1792&partnerID=40&md5=ea03452034836c2264bcd4f2044a4ecc

U2 - 10.1002/pad.1792

DO - 10.1002/pad.1792

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 37

SP - 65

EP - 78

JO - Public Administration and Development

JF - Public Administration and Development

SN - 0271-2075

IS - 1

ER -