GP fundholding and prescribing in UK general practice : evidence from two rural , English Family Health Services Authorities

D. L. BAINES, P. Brigham, David Rosser PHILLIPS, K. H. TOLLEY, David K. WHYNES

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Two separate prescribing budget regimes (part of GP fundholding and the indicative prescribing scheme) were introduced into UK general practice in April 1991 in an attempt to contain the growth in NHS expenditure on prescribed drugs.

Objectives: The aims of this study are (i) to examine whether the fundholding scheme has been more effective at containing prescribing cost growth than the indicative prescribing scheme and (ii) to ascertain whether its implementation, at a practice level, has been affected by local circumstances and conditions.

Methods: Prescribing cost data were collected from two rural, English Family Health Services Authorities for the financial years 1990/1991 to 1993/1994. Exploratory analysis was performed using regression analysis and non-parametric statistical techniques.

Results and conclusions: Initially, the fundholding scheme has been the more effective at containing expenditure on prescribed drugs. However, the implementation of the schemes in rural areas has probably been affected by the existence of practices with permission to dispense drugs to their own patients, due to a lack of pharmacies in such areas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321 - 325
Number of pages5
JournalPublic Health
Volume111
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1997
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • fundholding
  • dispensing
  • prescribing costs
  • general practice
  • rurality

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'GP fundholding and prescribing in UK general practice : evidence from two rural , English Family Health Services Authorities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this