Group risk taking : the constructive role of controversy in China

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Considerable research has suggested that because of persistent cognitive biases organizations often lack the ability and discipline to take risks effectively. However, group members who discuss their opposing views openly for mutual benefit (constructive controversy) may be able to manage risks effectively. Members of 107 teams working in Chinese organizations indicated their constructive controversy and risk taking; their manager provided ratings of the group's innovation and recovery from mistakes. Results of the structural equation analysis supported the reasoning that constructive controversy can facilitate risk taking that, in turn, promotes innovation and recovery.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)653-674
Number of pages22
JournalGroup and Organization Management
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Risk-Taking
China
Aptitude
Research
Recovery
Innovation
Risk Taking
Constructive controversy
Risk taking
Structural Equations
Managers
Cognitive Bias
Mistakes
Rating

Cite this

@article{73d1df851fcc408e99786cf49cb226cb,
title = "Group risk taking : the constructive role of controversy in China",
abstract = "Considerable research has suggested that because of persistent cognitive biases organizations often lack the ability and discipline to take risks effectively. However, group members who discuss their opposing views openly for mutual benefit (constructive controversy) may be able to manage risks effectively. Members of 107 teams working in Chinese organizations indicated their constructive controversy and risk taking; their manager provided ratings of the group's innovation and recovery from mistakes. Results of the structural equation analysis supported the reasoning that constructive controversy can facilitate risk taking that, in turn, promotes innovation and recovery.",
author = "TJOSVOLD, {Dean William} and Ziyou YU",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1059601106287110",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "653--674",
journal = "Group and Organization Management",
issn = "1059-6011",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Group risk taking : the constructive role of controversy in China. / TJOSVOLD, Dean William; YU, Ziyou.

In: Group and Organization Management, Vol. 32, No. 6, 01.12.2007, p. 653-674.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group risk taking : the constructive role of controversy in China

AU - TJOSVOLD, Dean William

AU - YU, Ziyou

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Considerable research has suggested that because of persistent cognitive biases organizations often lack the ability and discipline to take risks effectively. However, group members who discuss their opposing views openly for mutual benefit (constructive controversy) may be able to manage risks effectively. Members of 107 teams working in Chinese organizations indicated their constructive controversy and risk taking; their manager provided ratings of the group's innovation and recovery from mistakes. Results of the structural equation analysis supported the reasoning that constructive controversy can facilitate risk taking that, in turn, promotes innovation and recovery.

AB - Considerable research has suggested that because of persistent cognitive biases organizations often lack the ability and discipline to take risks effectively. However, group members who discuss their opposing views openly for mutual benefit (constructive controversy) may be able to manage risks effectively. Members of 107 teams working in Chinese organizations indicated their constructive controversy and risk taking; their manager provided ratings of the group's innovation and recovery from mistakes. Results of the structural equation analysis supported the reasoning that constructive controversy can facilitate risk taking that, in turn, promotes innovation and recovery.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2126

U2 - 10.1177/1059601106287110

DO - 10.1177/1059601106287110

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 32

SP - 653

EP - 674

JO - Group and Organization Management

JF - Group and Organization Management

SN - 1059-6011

IS - 6

ER -