Abstract
Under neoliberalism, national quality assurance systems in Asia were developed with a focus on “accountability” in response to several global manifestations in higher education. As higher education systems in Asia vary and QA mechanisms continue to transform after 2000, this quantitative research aims to revisit current standard frameworks in higher education, as well as explore new emerging standards from the perspective of the Asian quality assurance agencies. There are three major findings in this study. First, three current standards: institutional governance and management, teaching and learning, and student learning support and resources were considered the most important. Second, employability and digitalization and employability as emerging standards were regarded the most significant. Third, the biggest challenge for developing these new QA standard frameworks is stakeholder engagement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 244-266 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Higher Education Policy |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 21 Nov 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© International Association of Universities 2024.
Funding
Funding was provided by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Grant No. MOST 111-2410-H-004-125-MY2).
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Asia
- Higher education
- Quality assurance
- Standards
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How do Quality Assurance Agencies in Asia Measure Higher Education? Exploring Approaches, Emerging Standards, and Challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver