Abstract
Libertarian philosopher Michael Huemer has argued recently that there is a prima facie right to immigrate, and, moreover, that concerns people have about the effects of immigration are not strong enough to neutralize or override this prima facie right. In this paper, I focus on one particular concern that Huemer deems insufficiently strong to neutralize or override the prima facie right to immigrate, namely, the concern that unrestricted immigration poses a threat to one’s culture. I argue that Huemer fails to show that the concern is insufficiently strong.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1091-1098 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Philosophia |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 20 Mar 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Cultural preservation
- Immigration
- Open borders
- Rights
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Huemer on immigration and the preservation of culture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver