Several philosophers have argued that human enhancements should be considered a potential solution to climate change. In this paper, I consider one such argument offered by S. Matthew Liao, Anders Sandberg, and Rebecca Roache. I argue that, while their argument is plausible, we have an even stronger reason to consider enhancements a potential solution. In particular, enhancements could align our interests with the promotion of a proper response to climate change: if enhancements were in our interest to adopt and also reduced the pernicious effects of climate change, then it would, indirectly, become in our interest to reduce those effects.
|Number of pages||12|
|Journal||Ethics, Policy and Environment|
|Early online date||24 Mar 2020|
|Publication status||Published - Mar 2020|
Bibliographical notePublisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
- climate change
- collective action
- Human enhancement