Humans, animals, and metaphors

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the ideological implications of different interpretations of the statement "Humans are animals." It contrasts theories that regard humans as literally sophisticated animals with those who interpret the statement metaphorically. Sociobiological theories, bolstered by metaphors in the dictionary of English emphasize competitiveness and aggression as features shared by humans and nonhuman animals. Other theories emphasize symbiosis and cooperation. Some of these theories are prescriptive - metaphor patterns in English reflect the strong tendency to regard animal behavior as something for humans to avoid. Conversely, sociobiologists suggest it is natural and right to behave like animals, the naturalistic fallacy. Other cultural theories suggest that the statement is only metaphorical; our differences from animals are what make us most human. The article notes the tendency to metaphorically project the values and structures of current human society onto the animals being studied, serving the interest of those who, in power, benefit from the status quo.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-37
Number of pages23
JournalSociety and Animals
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Metaphor
metaphor
animal
animals
Animal Behavior
Symbiosis
cultural theory
Aggression
animal behavior
symbiosis
aggression
dictionary
competitiveness
interpretation
Values

Cite this

GOATLY, Andrew. / Humans, animals, and metaphors. In: Society and Animals. 2006 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 15-37.
@article{82ab799cc62a4693ab9f54e9a7bff44a,
title = "Humans, animals, and metaphors",
abstract = "This article examines the ideological implications of different interpretations of the statement {"}Humans are animals.{"} It contrasts theories that regard humans as literally sophisticated animals with those who interpret the statement metaphorically. Sociobiological theories, bolstered by metaphors in the dictionary of English emphasize competitiveness and aggression as features shared by humans and nonhuman animals. Other theories emphasize symbiosis and cooperation. Some of these theories are prescriptive - metaphor patterns in English reflect the strong tendency to regard animal behavior as something for humans to avoid. Conversely, sociobiologists suggest it is natural and right to behave like animals, the naturalistic fallacy. Other cultural theories suggest that the statement is only metaphorical; our differences from animals are what make us most human. The article notes the tendency to metaphorically project the values and structures of current human society onto the animals being studied, serving the interest of those who, in power, benefit from the status quo.",
author = "Andrew GOATLY",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/156853006776137131",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "15--37",
journal = "Society and Animals",
issn = "1063-1119",
publisher = "Brill Academic Publishers",
number = "1",

}

Humans, animals, and metaphors. / GOATLY, Andrew.

In: Society and Animals, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.01.2006, p. 15-37.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Humans, animals, and metaphors

AU - GOATLY, Andrew

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - This article examines the ideological implications of different interpretations of the statement "Humans are animals." It contrasts theories that regard humans as literally sophisticated animals with those who interpret the statement metaphorically. Sociobiological theories, bolstered by metaphors in the dictionary of English emphasize competitiveness and aggression as features shared by humans and nonhuman animals. Other theories emphasize symbiosis and cooperation. Some of these theories are prescriptive - metaphor patterns in English reflect the strong tendency to regard animal behavior as something for humans to avoid. Conversely, sociobiologists suggest it is natural and right to behave like animals, the naturalistic fallacy. Other cultural theories suggest that the statement is only metaphorical; our differences from animals are what make us most human. The article notes the tendency to metaphorically project the values and structures of current human society onto the animals being studied, serving the interest of those who, in power, benefit from the status quo.

AB - This article examines the ideological implications of different interpretations of the statement "Humans are animals." It contrasts theories that regard humans as literally sophisticated animals with those who interpret the statement metaphorically. Sociobiological theories, bolstered by metaphors in the dictionary of English emphasize competitiveness and aggression as features shared by humans and nonhuman animals. Other theories emphasize symbiosis and cooperation. Some of these theories are prescriptive - metaphor patterns in English reflect the strong tendency to regard animal behavior as something for humans to avoid. Conversely, sociobiologists suggest it is natural and right to behave like animals, the naturalistic fallacy. Other cultural theories suggest that the statement is only metaphorical; our differences from animals are what make us most human. The article notes the tendency to metaphorically project the values and structures of current human society onto the animals being studied, serving the interest of those who, in power, benefit from the status quo.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/7070

U2 - 10.1163/156853006776137131

DO - 10.1163/156853006776137131

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 14

SP - 15

EP - 37

JO - Society and Animals

JF - Society and Animals

SN - 1063-1119

IS - 1

ER -