Identifying the unprecedented : Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

How does one identify a phenomenon as radically new or "unprecedented"? Do, in fact, "unprecedented" phenomena exist at all, as presumably some degree of continuity marks every state of affairs? If however, the idea of continuity is taken too far, are we not at risk of domesticating a radical tendency by conceptually transmuting it into something that is already known? These questions are of pressing importance since September 11th, as commentators warn that America and its allies face radically new enemies in the guise of "rogue" states, movements, and terrorist organizations. Yet sociology has had to grapple with similar issues before. In the 1930s and 1940s, the consolidation of fascist and Nazi movements also taxed sociological understanding and competence to the maximum. This article describes aspects of American sociology's response to that earlier challenge, contrasting it with the approach of Hannah Arendt, who condemned the discipline for systematically failing to appreciate the uniqueness, enormity, and gravity of the events that assailed the epoch. Arendt's critique of sociological methods is followed by a case study-Theodore Abel's investigation into National Socialism-that lends some credence to her misgivings. The work of other sociologists of this period-notably, Talcott Parsons's-is also briefly considered. The concluding section of the paper examines the theoretical problems involved in seeking to conceptualize an "unprecedented" event (movement, institution).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHannah Arendt : critical assessments of leading political philosophers
EditorsGarrath WILLIAMS
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Pages224-264
Number of pages41
Volume1
ISBN (Print)9780415343312
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

totalitarianism
continuity
sociology
event
socialism
allies
sociologist
consolidation

Bibliographical note

Originally published in American Sociological Review (December 2002), 67(6), 804-831, doi: 10.2307/3088971

Cite this

BAEHR, P. (2006). Identifying the unprecedented : Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology. In G. WILLIAMS (Ed.), Hannah Arendt : critical assessments of leading political philosophers (Vol. 1, pp. 224-264). London: Routledge.
BAEHR, Peter. / Identifying the unprecedented : Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology. Hannah Arendt : critical assessments of leading political philosophers. editor / Garrath WILLIAMS. Vol. 1 London : Routledge, 2006. pp. 224-264
@inbook{4029cb1ddbab4413af6fe7bab94cfebb,
title = "Identifying the unprecedented : Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology",
abstract = "How does one identify a phenomenon as radically new or {"}unprecedented{"}? Do, in fact, {"}unprecedented{"} phenomena exist at all, as presumably some degree of continuity marks every state of affairs? If however, the idea of continuity is taken too far, are we not at risk of domesticating a radical tendency by conceptually transmuting it into something that is already known? These questions are of pressing importance since September 11th, as commentators warn that America and its allies face radically new enemies in the guise of {"}rogue{"} states, movements, and terrorist organizations. Yet sociology has had to grapple with similar issues before. In the 1930s and 1940s, the consolidation of fascist and Nazi movements also taxed sociological understanding and competence to the maximum. This article describes aspects of American sociology's response to that earlier challenge, contrasting it with the approach of Hannah Arendt, who condemned the discipline for systematically failing to appreciate the uniqueness, enormity, and gravity of the events that assailed the epoch. Arendt's critique of sociological methods is followed by a case study-Theodore Abel's investigation into National Socialism-that lends some credence to her misgivings. The work of other sociologists of this period-notably, Talcott Parsons's-is also briefly considered. The concluding section of the paper examines the theoretical problems involved in seeking to conceptualize an {"}unprecedented{"} event (movement, institution).",
author = "Peter BAEHR",
note = "Originally published in American Sociological Review (December 2002), 67(6), 804-831, doi: 10.2307/3088971",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780415343312",
volume = "1",
pages = "224--264",
editor = "Garrath WILLIAMS",
booktitle = "Hannah Arendt : critical assessments of leading political philosophers",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

BAEHR, P 2006, Identifying the unprecedented : Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology. in G WILLIAMS (ed.), Hannah Arendt : critical assessments of leading political philosophers. vol. 1, Routledge, London, pp. 224-264.

Identifying the unprecedented : Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology. / BAEHR, Peter.

Hannah Arendt : critical assessments of leading political philosophers. ed. / Garrath WILLIAMS. Vol. 1 London : Routledge, 2006. p. 224-264.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Identifying the unprecedented : Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology

AU - BAEHR, Peter

N1 - Originally published in American Sociological Review (December 2002), 67(6), 804-831, doi: 10.2307/3088971

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - How does one identify a phenomenon as radically new or "unprecedented"? Do, in fact, "unprecedented" phenomena exist at all, as presumably some degree of continuity marks every state of affairs? If however, the idea of continuity is taken too far, are we not at risk of domesticating a radical tendency by conceptually transmuting it into something that is already known? These questions are of pressing importance since September 11th, as commentators warn that America and its allies face radically new enemies in the guise of "rogue" states, movements, and terrorist organizations. Yet sociology has had to grapple with similar issues before. In the 1930s and 1940s, the consolidation of fascist and Nazi movements also taxed sociological understanding and competence to the maximum. This article describes aspects of American sociology's response to that earlier challenge, contrasting it with the approach of Hannah Arendt, who condemned the discipline for systematically failing to appreciate the uniqueness, enormity, and gravity of the events that assailed the epoch. Arendt's critique of sociological methods is followed by a case study-Theodore Abel's investigation into National Socialism-that lends some credence to her misgivings. The work of other sociologists of this period-notably, Talcott Parsons's-is also briefly considered. The concluding section of the paper examines the theoretical problems involved in seeking to conceptualize an "unprecedented" event (movement, institution).

AB - How does one identify a phenomenon as radically new or "unprecedented"? Do, in fact, "unprecedented" phenomena exist at all, as presumably some degree of continuity marks every state of affairs? If however, the idea of continuity is taken too far, are we not at risk of domesticating a radical tendency by conceptually transmuting it into something that is already known? These questions are of pressing importance since September 11th, as commentators warn that America and its allies face radically new enemies in the guise of "rogue" states, movements, and terrorist organizations. Yet sociology has had to grapple with similar issues before. In the 1930s and 1940s, the consolidation of fascist and Nazi movements also taxed sociological understanding and competence to the maximum. This article describes aspects of American sociology's response to that earlier challenge, contrasting it with the approach of Hannah Arendt, who condemned the discipline for systematically failing to appreciate the uniqueness, enormity, and gravity of the events that assailed the epoch. Arendt's critique of sociological methods is followed by a case study-Theodore Abel's investigation into National Socialism-that lends some credence to her misgivings. The work of other sociologists of this period-notably, Talcott Parsons's-is also briefly considered. The concluding section of the paper examines the theoretical problems involved in seeking to conceptualize an "unprecedented" event (movement, institution).

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9780415343312

VL - 1

SP - 224

EP - 264

BT - Hannah Arendt : critical assessments of leading political philosophers

A2 - WILLIAMS, Garrath

PB - Routledge

CY - London

ER -

BAEHR P. Identifying the unprecedented : Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology. In WILLIAMS G, editor, Hannah Arendt : critical assessments of leading political philosophers. Vol. 1. London: Routledge. 2006. p. 224-264