Ideographic Myth and Misconceptions about Chinese Poetic Art

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

What is unique about Chinese poetic art? To what extent has the Chinese language given rise to it? These questions were not raised by traditional Chinese critics working exclusively within their own tradition. Not until Chinese poetry came to the West in the eighteenth century did such questions begin to emerge and engage Sinologists and lovers of Chinese culture. In the early twentieth century, Ezra Pound brought out Ernest Fenollosa’s essay “The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry.” This not only gave a new direction to modern American poetry,1 but inspired an upsurge of efforts by mid-century Sinologists to unlock the secret of Chinese poetic art by tracing its roots to Chinese writing. Seminal in this vein are Peter A. Boodberg on the “semasiology” of Chinese political and literary concepts,2 and Ch’en Shih-hsiang’s and Chow Tse-tsung’s etymological studies of key characters associated with poetry-making.3 By now this linguistic approach to Chinese poetry has been widely embraced by Chinese scholars and Sinologists alike.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTensions in World Literature : Between the Local and the Universal
EditorsWeigui Fang
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter12
Pages253-264
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9789811306358
ISBN (Print)9789811306341
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Chinese Poetry
Poetry
Art
Misconceptions
Poetics
Semasiology
Rise
Chinese Language
Chinese Culture
Ezra Pound
Lovers
American Poetry
Chinese Writing

Cite this

CAI, Z. (2018). Ideographic Myth and Misconceptions about Chinese Poetic Art. In W. Fang (Ed.), Tensions in World Literature : Between the Local and the Universal (pp. 253-264). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0635-8_12
CAI, Zong-qi. / Ideographic Myth and Misconceptions about Chinese Poetic Art. Tensions in World Literature : Between the Local and the Universal. editor / Weigui Fang. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. pp. 253-264
@inbook{e4304f71baf84f5a84737ecb1bd57867,
title = "Ideographic Myth and Misconceptions about Chinese Poetic Art",
abstract = "What is unique about Chinese poetic art? To what extent has the Chinese language given rise to it? These questions were not raised by traditional Chinese critics working exclusively within their own tradition. Not until Chinese poetry came to the West in the eighteenth century did such questions begin to emerge and engage Sinologists and lovers of Chinese culture. In the early twentieth century, Ezra Pound brought out Ernest Fenollosa’s essay “The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry.” This not only gave a new direction to modern American poetry,1 but inspired an upsurge of efforts by mid-century Sinologists to unlock the secret of Chinese poetic art by tracing its roots to Chinese writing. Seminal in this vein are Peter A. Boodberg on the “semasiology” of Chinese political and literary concepts,2 and Ch’en Shih-hsiang’s and Chow Tse-tsung’s etymological studies of key characters associated with poetry-making.3 By now this linguistic approach to Chinese poetry has been widely embraced by Chinese scholars and Sinologists alike.",
author = "Zong-qi CAI",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/978-981-13-0635-8_12",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789811306341",
pages = "253--264",
editor = "Weigui Fang",
booktitle = "Tensions in World Literature : Between the Local and the Universal",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

CAI, Z 2018, Ideographic Myth and Misconceptions about Chinese Poetic Art. in W Fang (ed.), Tensions in World Literature : Between the Local and the Universal. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 253-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0635-8_12

Ideographic Myth and Misconceptions about Chinese Poetic Art. / CAI, Zong-qi.

Tensions in World Literature : Between the Local and the Universal. ed. / Weigui Fang. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. p. 253-264.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Ideographic Myth and Misconceptions about Chinese Poetic Art

AU - CAI, Zong-qi

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - What is unique about Chinese poetic art? To what extent has the Chinese language given rise to it? These questions were not raised by traditional Chinese critics working exclusively within their own tradition. Not until Chinese poetry came to the West in the eighteenth century did such questions begin to emerge and engage Sinologists and lovers of Chinese culture. In the early twentieth century, Ezra Pound brought out Ernest Fenollosa’s essay “The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry.” This not only gave a new direction to modern American poetry,1 but inspired an upsurge of efforts by mid-century Sinologists to unlock the secret of Chinese poetic art by tracing its roots to Chinese writing. Seminal in this vein are Peter A. Boodberg on the “semasiology” of Chinese political and literary concepts,2 and Ch’en Shih-hsiang’s and Chow Tse-tsung’s etymological studies of key characters associated with poetry-making.3 By now this linguistic approach to Chinese poetry has been widely embraced by Chinese scholars and Sinologists alike.

AB - What is unique about Chinese poetic art? To what extent has the Chinese language given rise to it? These questions were not raised by traditional Chinese critics working exclusively within their own tradition. Not until Chinese poetry came to the West in the eighteenth century did such questions begin to emerge and engage Sinologists and lovers of Chinese culture. In the early twentieth century, Ezra Pound brought out Ernest Fenollosa’s essay “The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry.” This not only gave a new direction to modern American poetry,1 but inspired an upsurge of efforts by mid-century Sinologists to unlock the secret of Chinese poetic art by tracing its roots to Chinese writing. Seminal in this vein are Peter A. Boodberg on the “semasiology” of Chinese political and literary concepts,2 and Ch’en Shih-hsiang’s and Chow Tse-tsung’s etymological studies of key characters associated with poetry-making.3 By now this linguistic approach to Chinese poetry has been widely embraced by Chinese scholars and Sinologists alike.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063437661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-981-13-0635-8_12

DO - 10.1007/978-981-13-0635-8_12

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9789811306341

SP - 253

EP - 264

BT - Tensions in World Literature : Between the Local and the Universal

A2 - Fang, Weigui

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -

CAI Z. Ideographic Myth and Misconceptions about Chinese Poetic Art. In Fang W, editor, Tensions in World Literature : Between the Local and the Universal. Palgrave Macmillan. 2018. p. 253-264 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0635-8_12