Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Improving the matching precision of SIFT

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsConference paper (refereed)Researchpeer-review

Abstract

We evaluate and improve the matching precision of the SIFT method [1], defined as the root mean square error (RMSE) under a ground truth geometric transform. We first argue that the matching precision reflects to some extent the average relative localization precision between two images. For scale invariant feature detectors like SIFT, we show that the matching precision decreases with the scale of the keypoints, and that this is caused by the scale space sub-sampling in SIFT. We verify that canceling this sub-sampling therefore improves drastically the matching precision. Yet, in case of scale change, this improvement is marginal due to the coarse scale quantization in the scale space. A more sophisticated method is therefore also proposed to improve the matching precision even in case of scale change. This incremented precision is a key ingredient in many important image processing tasks requiring the best precision, such as registration, stitching, and camera calibration.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2014
PublisherIEEE
Pages5756-5760
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781479957514
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes
Event2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) - CNIT La Défense, Paris, France
Duration: 27 Oct 201430 Oct 2014
https://icip2014.wp.imt.fr/

Conference

Conference2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)
Country/TerritoryFrance
CityParis
Period27/10/1430/10/14
Internet address

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 IEEE.

Keywords

  • localization precision
  • Matching precision
  • scale space
  • scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving the matching precision of SIFT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this