Individual decision-making in organizations : contribution of uncertainty and controversy in China

Dean TJOSVOLD, Ann Chunyan PENG, Nancy Yifeng CHEN, Sofia Su FANG

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Uncertainty has been thought to challenge the cognitive capabilities of managers and thereby undermine their decision-making abilities. However, managers who experience uncertainty in that they are unsure of the adequacy of their own position may open-mindedly consult with their colleagues in the organization before they make the decision. A sample of 122 Chinese mainland managers described and rated a critical incident when they tried to make a decision. Regression analyses indicated that to the extent that managers initially felt uncertain about the solution they engaged in constructive controversy, i.e. the open-minded discussion for mutual benefit, which, in turn, led to effective decision-making. Cooperative goals further moderated the association of uncertainty with cooperative goals such that the positive association was stronger with less cooperative goals. These results underline the positive role of uncertainty in solving difficult problems, especially under competitive goals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)801-821
Number of pages21
JournalGroup Decision and Negotiation
Volume22
Issue number4
Early online date30 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Managers
Decision making
uncertainty
manager
decision making
China
incident
organization
regression
Uncertainty
Individual decision making
Decision Making
ability
experience

Keywords

  • Constructive controversy
  • Decision making
  • Goal independence
  • Uncertainty

Cite this

@article{73dd1ae2fe914a148548a4442c2f6e38,
title = "Individual decision-making in organizations : contribution of uncertainty and controversy in China",
abstract = "Uncertainty has been thought to challenge the cognitive capabilities of managers and thereby undermine their decision-making abilities. However, managers who experience uncertainty in that they are unsure of the adequacy of their own position may open-mindedly consult with their colleagues in the organization before they make the decision. A sample of 122 Chinese mainland managers described and rated a critical incident when they tried to make a decision. Regression analyses indicated that to the extent that managers initially felt uncertain about the solution they engaged in constructive controversy, i.e. the open-minded discussion for mutual benefit, which, in turn, led to effective decision-making. Cooperative goals further moderated the association of uncertainty with cooperative goals such that the positive association was stronger with less cooperative goals. These results underline the positive role of uncertainty in solving difficult problems, especially under competitive goals.",
keywords = "Constructive controversy, Decision making, Goal independence, Uncertainty",
author = "Dean TJOSVOLD and PENG, {Ann Chunyan} and CHEN, {Nancy Yifeng} and FANG, {Sofia Su}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s10726-012-9294-6",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "801--821",
journal = "Group Decision and Negotiation",
issn = "0926-2644",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

Individual decision-making in organizations : contribution of uncertainty and controversy in China. / TJOSVOLD, Dean; PENG, Ann Chunyan; CHEN, Nancy Yifeng; FANG, Sofia Su.

In: Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 22, No. 4, 07.2013, p. 801-821.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual decision-making in organizations : contribution of uncertainty and controversy in China

AU - TJOSVOLD, Dean

AU - PENG, Ann Chunyan

AU - CHEN, Nancy Yifeng

AU - FANG, Sofia Su

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Uncertainty has been thought to challenge the cognitive capabilities of managers and thereby undermine their decision-making abilities. However, managers who experience uncertainty in that they are unsure of the adequacy of their own position may open-mindedly consult with their colleagues in the organization before they make the decision. A sample of 122 Chinese mainland managers described and rated a critical incident when they tried to make a decision. Regression analyses indicated that to the extent that managers initially felt uncertain about the solution they engaged in constructive controversy, i.e. the open-minded discussion for mutual benefit, which, in turn, led to effective decision-making. Cooperative goals further moderated the association of uncertainty with cooperative goals such that the positive association was stronger with less cooperative goals. These results underline the positive role of uncertainty in solving difficult problems, especially under competitive goals.

AB - Uncertainty has been thought to challenge the cognitive capabilities of managers and thereby undermine their decision-making abilities. However, managers who experience uncertainty in that they are unsure of the adequacy of their own position may open-mindedly consult with their colleagues in the organization before they make the decision. A sample of 122 Chinese mainland managers described and rated a critical incident when they tried to make a decision. Regression analyses indicated that to the extent that managers initially felt uncertain about the solution they engaged in constructive controversy, i.e. the open-minded discussion for mutual benefit, which, in turn, led to effective decision-making. Cooperative goals further moderated the association of uncertainty with cooperative goals such that the positive association was stronger with less cooperative goals. These results underline the positive role of uncertainty in solving difficult problems, especially under competitive goals.

KW - Constructive controversy

KW - Decision making

KW - Goal independence

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/565

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877926800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10726-012-9294-6

DO - 10.1007/s10726-012-9294-6

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 22

SP - 801

EP - 821

JO - Group Decision and Negotiation

JF - Group Decision and Negotiation

SN - 0926-2644

IS - 4

ER -