Individual differences in consumer responses to traditional versus virtual concept testing

Ling PENG, Geng CUI, Chunyu LI

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of innovativeness, change seeking and cognitive effort on consumer responses to traditional versus virtual testing environment. Design/methodology/approach – The empirical study collects concept evaluations of five heterogeneous consumer appliances, from 400 members of an online panel. Generalizability theory (hereafter G theory) is used to assess the psychometric quality of the evaluation data in different testing environments. Findings – The results show that subjects with high innovativeness and change seeking report significantly more favorable concept evaluations and generate better quality data. However, the effect of innovativeness on testing outcomes and data quality would be reduced in virtual testing environment. Practical implications – The results indicate that using firm or industry norms to interpret the testing outcome will be biased unless it accounts for whether the screening processes result in equally innovative or variety seeking samples of respondents. Originality/value – Managerially, the current results indicate that a product manager wanting to concept test a pool of appliance concepts can benefit from screening for the respondents, who will provide higher quality concept testing data in a traditional testing environment. However, the effects of traits on data quality are mitigated in a virtual testing environment. The findings provide a surprising insight that subject selection is not a more critical issue in virtual testing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-175
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Product and Brand Management
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Testing
Screening
Individual differences
Consumer response
Managers
Innovativeness
Evaluation
Data quality
Industry

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Consumer behaviour
  • change seeking
  • cognitive effort
  • generalizability theory
  • innovativeness
  • tests and testing
  • virtual concept testing

Cite this

@article{1d7af9ce63464aae80b8acdf08a6ea3a,
title = "Individual differences in consumer responses to traditional versus virtual concept testing",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of innovativeness, change seeking and cognitive effort on consumer responses to traditional versus virtual testing environment. Design/methodology/approach – The empirical study collects concept evaluations of five heterogeneous consumer appliances, from 400 members of an online panel. Generalizability theory (hereafter G theory) is used to assess the psychometric quality of the evaluation data in different testing environments. Findings – The results show that subjects with high innovativeness and change seeking report significantly more favorable concept evaluations and generate better quality data. However, the effect of innovativeness on testing outcomes and data quality would be reduced in virtual testing environment. Practical implications – The results indicate that using firm or industry norms to interpret the testing outcome will be biased unless it accounts for whether the screening processes result in equally innovative or variety seeking samples of respondents. Originality/value – Managerially, the current results indicate that a product manager wanting to concept test a pool of appliance concepts can benefit from screening for the respondents, who will provide higher quality concept testing data in a traditional testing environment. However, the effects of traits on data quality are mitigated in a virtual testing environment. The findings provide a surprising insight that subject selection is not a more critical issue in virtual testing.",
keywords = "Cognition, Consumer behaviour, change seeking, cognitive effort, generalizability theory, innovativeness, tests and testing, virtual concept testing",
author = "Ling PENG and Geng CUI and Chunyu LI",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/10610421211228784",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "167--175",
journal = "Journal of Product and Brand Management",
issn = "1061-0421",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Individual differences in consumer responses to traditional versus virtual concept testing. / PENG, Ling; CUI, Geng; LI, Chunyu.

In: Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 21, No. 3, 01.01.2012, p. 167-175.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in consumer responses to traditional versus virtual concept testing

AU - PENG, Ling

AU - CUI, Geng

AU - LI, Chunyu

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of innovativeness, change seeking and cognitive effort on consumer responses to traditional versus virtual testing environment. Design/methodology/approach – The empirical study collects concept evaluations of five heterogeneous consumer appliances, from 400 members of an online panel. Generalizability theory (hereafter G theory) is used to assess the psychometric quality of the evaluation data in different testing environments. Findings – The results show that subjects with high innovativeness and change seeking report significantly more favorable concept evaluations and generate better quality data. However, the effect of innovativeness on testing outcomes and data quality would be reduced in virtual testing environment. Practical implications – The results indicate that using firm or industry norms to interpret the testing outcome will be biased unless it accounts for whether the screening processes result in equally innovative or variety seeking samples of respondents. Originality/value – Managerially, the current results indicate that a product manager wanting to concept test a pool of appliance concepts can benefit from screening for the respondents, who will provide higher quality concept testing data in a traditional testing environment. However, the effects of traits on data quality are mitigated in a virtual testing environment. The findings provide a surprising insight that subject selection is not a more critical issue in virtual testing.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of innovativeness, change seeking and cognitive effort on consumer responses to traditional versus virtual testing environment. Design/methodology/approach – The empirical study collects concept evaluations of five heterogeneous consumer appliances, from 400 members of an online panel. Generalizability theory (hereafter G theory) is used to assess the psychometric quality of the evaluation data in different testing environments. Findings – The results show that subjects with high innovativeness and change seeking report significantly more favorable concept evaluations and generate better quality data. However, the effect of innovativeness on testing outcomes and data quality would be reduced in virtual testing environment. Practical implications – The results indicate that using firm or industry norms to interpret the testing outcome will be biased unless it accounts for whether the screening processes result in equally innovative or variety seeking samples of respondents. Originality/value – Managerially, the current results indicate that a product manager wanting to concept test a pool of appliance concepts can benefit from screening for the respondents, who will provide higher quality concept testing data in a traditional testing environment. However, the effects of traits on data quality are mitigated in a virtual testing environment. The findings provide a surprising insight that subject selection is not a more critical issue in virtual testing.

KW - Cognition

KW - Consumer behaviour

KW - change seeking

KW - cognitive effort

KW - generalizability theory

KW - innovativeness

KW - tests and testing

KW - virtual concept testing

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/617

U2 - 10.1108/10610421211228784

DO - 10.1108/10610421211228784

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 21

SP - 167

EP - 175

JO - Journal of Product and Brand Management

JF - Journal of Product and Brand Management

SN - 1061-0421

IS - 3

ER -