Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Institutionalised Commitment and Its Origins

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)peer-review

Abstract

Schelling (1960) and Frank (1988) famously offered commitment as an explanation of the stability of human cooperation in the face of incentives to cheat. Reputationally-enforced commitments were part of the explanation for human cooperation for much of our history (Khan, 2024, 2025). In this article, I consider the origins and effects of institutionalised commitments. These are commitments which are contractually enforced by third parties, rather than only reputationally enforced. I discuss how these commitment offer advantages for securing cooperation over and above our previous forms of commitment. I then offer an account of their potential origins. I suggest that a change in our cooperative landscape and organisational structure occurring in the Neolithic -- in particular, the rise of agricultural economies and hierarchical society -- opened the door to a new means of enforcement for commitments, affecting the success of our cooperative practices.
Original languageEnglish
JournalHuman Nature
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026.

Funding

This paper is part of a project that has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement no. 101018523). In addition, the work described in this paper was partially supported by a Senior Research Fellowship award from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR, China (‘Philosophy of Contemporary and Future Science’, Project no. SRFS2122-3H01).

Keywords

  • Commitment
  • Institution
  • Neolithic
  • Evolution
  • Cooperation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Institutionalised Commitment and Its Origins'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this