Integrating knowledge of multitasking and interruptions across different perspectives and research methods

Christian P. JANSSEN, Sandy J. J. GOULD, Yau Wai, Simon LI, Duncan P. BRUMBY, Anna L. COX

Research output: Journal PublicationsEditorial/Preface (Journal)

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multitasking and interruptions have been studied using a variety of methods in multiple fields (e.g., HCI, cognitive science, computer science, and social sciences). This diversity brings many complementary insights. However, it also challenges researchers to understand how seemingly disparate ideas can best be integrated to further theory and to inform the design of interactive systems. There is therefore a need for a platform to discuss how different approaches to understanding multitasking and interruptions can be combined to provide insights that are more than the sum of their parts. In this article we argue for the necessity of an integrative approach. As part of this argument we provide an overview of articles in this special issue on multitasking and interruptions. These articles showcase the variety of methods currently used to study multitasking and interruptions. It is clear that there are many challenges to studying multitasking and interruptions from different perspectives and using different techniques. We advance a six-point research agenda for the future of multi-method research on this important and timely topic.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Volume79
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2015

Fingerprint

multiple stress
Multitasking
research method
Social sciences
Human computer interaction
computer science
Computer science
social science
science

Bibliographical note

Part of special issue of International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

Cite this

@article{373940a9cb844d82b04b2d5925bd7e5b,
title = "Integrating knowledge of multitasking and interruptions across different perspectives and research methods",
abstract = "Multitasking and interruptions have been studied using a variety of methods in multiple fields (e.g., HCI, cognitive science, computer science, and social sciences). This diversity brings many complementary insights. However, it also challenges researchers to understand how seemingly disparate ideas can best be integrated to further theory and to inform the design of interactive systems. There is therefore a need for a platform to discuss how different approaches to understanding multitasking and interruptions can be combined to provide insights that are more than the sum of their parts. In this article we argue for the necessity of an integrative approach. As part of this argument we provide an overview of articles in this special issue on multitasking and interruptions. These articles showcase the variety of methods currently used to study multitasking and interruptions. It is clear that there are many challenges to studying multitasking and interruptions from different perspectives and using different techniques. We advance a six-point research agenda for the future of multi-method research on this important and timely topic.",
author = "JANSSEN, {Christian P.} and GOULD, {Sandy J. J.} and LI, {Yau Wai, Simon} and BRUMBY, {Duncan P.} and COX, {Anna L.}",
note = "Part of special issue of International Journal of Human-Computer Studies",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.03.002",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "International Journal of Human Computer Studies",
issn = "1071-5819",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Integrating knowledge of multitasking and interruptions across different perspectives and research methods. / JANSSEN, Christian P.; GOULD, Sandy J. J.; LI, Yau Wai, Simon; BRUMBY, Duncan P.; COX, Anna L.

In: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 79, 07.2015, p. 1-5.

Research output: Journal PublicationsEditorial/Preface (Journal)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating knowledge of multitasking and interruptions across different perspectives and research methods

AU - JANSSEN, Christian P.

AU - GOULD, Sandy J. J.

AU - LI, Yau Wai, Simon

AU - BRUMBY, Duncan P.

AU - COX, Anna L.

N1 - Part of special issue of International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

PY - 2015/7

Y1 - 2015/7

N2 - Multitasking and interruptions have been studied using a variety of methods in multiple fields (e.g., HCI, cognitive science, computer science, and social sciences). This diversity brings many complementary insights. However, it also challenges researchers to understand how seemingly disparate ideas can best be integrated to further theory and to inform the design of interactive systems. There is therefore a need for a platform to discuss how different approaches to understanding multitasking and interruptions can be combined to provide insights that are more than the sum of their parts. In this article we argue for the necessity of an integrative approach. As part of this argument we provide an overview of articles in this special issue on multitasking and interruptions. These articles showcase the variety of methods currently used to study multitasking and interruptions. It is clear that there are many challenges to studying multitasking and interruptions from different perspectives and using different techniques. We advance a six-point research agenda for the future of multi-method research on this important and timely topic.

AB - Multitasking and interruptions have been studied using a variety of methods in multiple fields (e.g., HCI, cognitive science, computer science, and social sciences). This diversity brings many complementary insights. However, it also challenges researchers to understand how seemingly disparate ideas can best be integrated to further theory and to inform the design of interactive systems. There is therefore a need for a platform to discuss how different approaches to understanding multitasking and interruptions can be combined to provide insights that are more than the sum of their parts. In this article we argue for the necessity of an integrative approach. As part of this argument we provide an overview of articles in this special issue on multitasking and interruptions. These articles showcase the variety of methods currently used to study multitasking and interruptions. It is clear that there are many challenges to studying multitasking and interruptions from different perspectives and using different techniques. We advance a six-point research agenda for the future of multi-method research on this important and timely topic.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/2584

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.03.002

M3 - Editorial/Preface (Journal)

VL - 79

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - International Journal of Human Computer Studies

JF - International Journal of Human Computer Studies

SN - 1071-5819

ER -