Abstract
We modify a canonical participation game used to study International Environmental Agreements (IEA), considering both mixed and pure strategies at the participation stage, and including a prior cost-reducing investment stage. The use of mixed strategies at the participation stage reverses a familiar result and also reverses the policy implication of that result: with mixed strategies, equilibrium participation and welfare are higher in equilibria that involve higher investment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 685-697 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Public Economics |
Volume | 96 |
Issue number | 9-10 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Climate agreement Participation game
- International Environmental Agreement
- Investment
- Mixed strategy