Interpreting an insurgency in Soviet Kazakhstan : the OGPU, Islam and Qazaq 'Clans' in Suzak, 1930

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The social and political relevance of categories such as “tribes” and “clans” in Central Asian societies supposedly organized around segmentary lineage systems is one of the most influential social sciences paradigms applied to the region. The present paper will assess the relevance of “tribal” identification, and the mobilization of tribal categories, during the forced collectivization campaign in 1930, the last period in which it is possible to find, in the documentation produced by the Tsarist/Soviet state, an extensive reference to the tribal/segmentary discourse in the description of Qazaq society. To this end, I will focus on a case-study of an anti-Soviet insurgency in Southern Kazakhstan in and near the town of Suzak during February 1930. The main documentary basis of the study is provided by OGPU reports and interrogations of insurgents, a source rarely used by historians because of the difficult accessibility of the former political police archives in many post-Soviet states. The paper will assess the usefulness of this documentation for the social history of the region during the early Soviet Union, arguing that this kind of source cannot be easily dismissed as a mere refraction of ideological categories produced by the Communist state. In the specific case-study at hand, I will try to show how “tribal” categories and alleged groups cannot explain the patterns and the leadership of the anti-Soviet revolts, even by the OGPU as an interpretative tool in order to understand the events unfolding in the countryside on the eve of the great famine of 1931-33. At the same time, I will show how forms of Islamic authority informed insurgents’ actions, and how the OGPU interpreted the connection between religious motives, (alleged) networks, and the insurgency. In line with some of the findings of the most recent anthropological research about other pastoral regions of Central Asia, this paper argues that tribal and clan names cannot be considered as corresponding to corporate groups and to social actors, and that the legacy of Tsarist administrative practice, and its influence on the socio-political relevance of “tribal” categorization, should be taken into consideration as an important factor in the social history of early Soviet Kazakhstan.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIslam, society and states across the Qazaq Steppe
PublisherVerlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Pages297-340
Number of pages44
ISBN (Print)9783700173366
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Islam
Insurgency
Kazakhstan
Social History
Documentation
Religion
Clan
Tribes
Documentary
Communist
Collectivisation
Revolt
Social Sciences
Accessibility
Countryside
Names
Interrogation
Great Famine
Asia
Discourse

Cite this

PIANCIOLA, N. (2013). Interpreting an insurgency in Soviet Kazakhstan : the OGPU, Islam and Qazaq 'Clans' in Suzak, 1930. In Islam, society and states across the Qazaq Steppe (pp. 297-340). Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
PIANCIOLA, Niccolò. / Interpreting an insurgency in Soviet Kazakhstan : the OGPU, Islam and Qazaq 'Clans' in Suzak, 1930. Islam, society and states across the Qazaq Steppe. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2013. pp. 297-340
@inbook{7ed248b1e1cd463580e8fd0236410875,
title = "Interpreting an insurgency in Soviet Kazakhstan : the OGPU, Islam and Qazaq 'Clans' in Suzak, 1930",
abstract = "The social and political relevance of categories such as “tribes” and “clans” in Central Asian societies supposedly organized around segmentary lineage systems is one of the most influential social sciences paradigms applied to the region. The present paper will assess the relevance of “tribal” identification, and the mobilization of tribal categories, during the forced collectivization campaign in 1930, the last period in which it is possible to find, in the documentation produced by the Tsarist/Soviet state, an extensive reference to the tribal/segmentary discourse in the description of Qazaq society. To this end, I will focus on a case-study of an anti-Soviet insurgency in Southern Kazakhstan in and near the town of Suzak during February 1930. The main documentary basis of the study is provided by OGPU reports and interrogations of insurgents, a source rarely used by historians because of the difficult accessibility of the former political police archives in many post-Soviet states. The paper will assess the usefulness of this documentation for the social history of the region during the early Soviet Union, arguing that this kind of source cannot be easily dismissed as a mere refraction of ideological categories produced by the Communist state. In the specific case-study at hand, I will try to show how “tribal” categories and alleged groups cannot explain the patterns and the leadership of the anti-Soviet revolts, even by the OGPU as an interpretative tool in order to understand the events unfolding in the countryside on the eve of the great famine of 1931-33. At the same time, I will show how forms of Islamic authority informed insurgents’ actions, and how the OGPU interpreted the connection between religious motives, (alleged) networks, and the insurgency. In line with some of the findings of the most recent anthropological research about other pastoral regions of Central Asia, this paper argues that tribal and clan names cannot be considered as corresponding to corporate groups and to social actors, and that the legacy of Tsarist administrative practice, and its influence on the socio-political relevance of “tribal” categorization, should be taken into consideration as an important factor in the social history of early Soviet Kazakhstan.",
author = "Niccol{\`o} PIANCIOLA",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "2",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783700173366",
pages = "297--340",
booktitle = "Islam, society and states across the Qazaq Steppe",
publisher = "Verlag der {\"O}sterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften",
address = "Austria",

}

PIANCIOLA, N 2013, Interpreting an insurgency in Soviet Kazakhstan : the OGPU, Islam and Qazaq 'Clans' in Suzak, 1930. in Islam, society and states across the Qazaq Steppe. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 297-340.

Interpreting an insurgency in Soviet Kazakhstan : the OGPU, Islam and Qazaq 'Clans' in Suzak, 1930. / PIANCIOLA, Niccolò.

Islam, society and states across the Qazaq Steppe. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2013. p. 297-340.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Interpreting an insurgency in Soviet Kazakhstan : the OGPU, Islam and Qazaq 'Clans' in Suzak, 1930

AU - PIANCIOLA, Niccolò

PY - 2013/10/2

Y1 - 2013/10/2

N2 - The social and political relevance of categories such as “tribes” and “clans” in Central Asian societies supposedly organized around segmentary lineage systems is one of the most influential social sciences paradigms applied to the region. The present paper will assess the relevance of “tribal” identification, and the mobilization of tribal categories, during the forced collectivization campaign in 1930, the last period in which it is possible to find, in the documentation produced by the Tsarist/Soviet state, an extensive reference to the tribal/segmentary discourse in the description of Qazaq society. To this end, I will focus on a case-study of an anti-Soviet insurgency in Southern Kazakhstan in and near the town of Suzak during February 1930. The main documentary basis of the study is provided by OGPU reports and interrogations of insurgents, a source rarely used by historians because of the difficult accessibility of the former political police archives in many post-Soviet states. The paper will assess the usefulness of this documentation for the social history of the region during the early Soviet Union, arguing that this kind of source cannot be easily dismissed as a mere refraction of ideological categories produced by the Communist state. In the specific case-study at hand, I will try to show how “tribal” categories and alleged groups cannot explain the patterns and the leadership of the anti-Soviet revolts, even by the OGPU as an interpretative tool in order to understand the events unfolding in the countryside on the eve of the great famine of 1931-33. At the same time, I will show how forms of Islamic authority informed insurgents’ actions, and how the OGPU interpreted the connection between religious motives, (alleged) networks, and the insurgency. In line with some of the findings of the most recent anthropological research about other pastoral regions of Central Asia, this paper argues that tribal and clan names cannot be considered as corresponding to corporate groups and to social actors, and that the legacy of Tsarist administrative practice, and its influence on the socio-political relevance of “tribal” categorization, should be taken into consideration as an important factor in the social history of early Soviet Kazakhstan.

AB - The social and political relevance of categories such as “tribes” and “clans” in Central Asian societies supposedly organized around segmentary lineage systems is one of the most influential social sciences paradigms applied to the region. The present paper will assess the relevance of “tribal” identification, and the mobilization of tribal categories, during the forced collectivization campaign in 1930, the last period in which it is possible to find, in the documentation produced by the Tsarist/Soviet state, an extensive reference to the tribal/segmentary discourse in the description of Qazaq society. To this end, I will focus on a case-study of an anti-Soviet insurgency in Southern Kazakhstan in and near the town of Suzak during February 1930. The main documentary basis of the study is provided by OGPU reports and interrogations of insurgents, a source rarely used by historians because of the difficult accessibility of the former political police archives in many post-Soviet states. The paper will assess the usefulness of this documentation for the social history of the region during the early Soviet Union, arguing that this kind of source cannot be easily dismissed as a mere refraction of ideological categories produced by the Communist state. In the specific case-study at hand, I will try to show how “tribal” categories and alleged groups cannot explain the patterns and the leadership of the anti-Soviet revolts, even by the OGPU as an interpretative tool in order to understand the events unfolding in the countryside on the eve of the great famine of 1931-33. At the same time, I will show how forms of Islamic authority informed insurgents’ actions, and how the OGPU interpreted the connection between religious motives, (alleged) networks, and the insurgency. In line with some of the findings of the most recent anthropological research about other pastoral regions of Central Asia, this paper argues that tribal and clan names cannot be considered as corresponding to corporate groups and to social actors, and that the legacy of Tsarist administrative practice, and its influence on the socio-political relevance of “tribal” categorization, should be taken into consideration as an important factor in the social history of early Soviet Kazakhstan.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/549

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9783700173366

SP - 297

EP - 340

BT - Islam, society and states across the Qazaq Steppe

PB - Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften

ER -

PIANCIOLA N. Interpreting an insurgency in Soviet Kazakhstan : the OGPU, Islam and Qazaq 'Clans' in Suzak, 1930. In Islam, society and states across the Qazaq Steppe. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 2013. p. 297-340