Abstract
Two competing views in sparse ontology are monism and pluralism. In Trogdon 2009 I propose an account of intrinsicality that I argue is both compatible with monism and pluralism and independently plausible. Skiles 2009 argues that my account fails on both fronts. In this note I respond to his two objections.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 555-558 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Australasian Journal of Philosophy |
| Volume | 88 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |