Introduction

Mette HJORT, Duncan PETRIE

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In a recent article entitled ‘An Atlas of World Cinema’, Dudley Andrew concludes his discussion in the following way: Let me not be coy. We still parse the world by nations. Film festivals identify entries by country, college courses are labelled ‘Japanese Cinema’, ‘French Film’, and textbooks are coming off the presses with titles such as Screening Ireland, Screening China, Italian National Cinema, and so on. But a wider conception of national image culture is around the corner, prophesied by phrases like ‘rooted cosmopolitanism’ and ‘critical regionalism’. (Andrew 2006: 26) Andrew's concluding remarks reference the recent emergence in film studies of a new critical vocabulary - ‘world cinema’, ‘transnational cinema’, ‘regional cinema’ - while his discussion of world cinema more generally responds to, and thus reflects, the need for fully developed conceptual models that will lend analytic precision to the terms in question. Particularly relevant in the present context is the way in which Andrew's reference to nations and to their inevitable persistence in film culture also acknowledges, at least implicitly, that innovative ways of understanding national elements must be part of the critical shift that is currently occurring in film studies.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Cinema of Small Nations
PublisherEdinburgh University Press
Pages1-20
Number of pages20
ISBN (Print)9780748630929
Publication statusPublished - 21 Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Cinema
Screening
Film Studies
Cosmopolitanism
Film Festivals
French Film
Film Culture
Regionalism
Conceptual Model
China
Persistence
Atlas
Japanese Cinema
Conception
National Image
Ireland
Critical Vocabulary
Textbooks
National Cinema

Cite this

HJORT, M., & PETRIE, D. (2007). Introduction. In The Cinema of Small Nations (pp. 1-20). Edinburgh University Press.
HJORT, Mette ; PETRIE, Duncan. / Introduction. The Cinema of Small Nations. Edinburgh University Press, 2007. pp. 1-20
@inbook{907ea9fe50854c7986e7b9bfb55ff262,
title = "Introduction",
abstract = "In a recent article entitled ‘An Atlas of World Cinema’, Dudley Andrew concludes his discussion in the following way: Let me not be coy. We still parse the world by nations. Film festivals identify entries by country, college courses are labelled ‘Japanese Cinema’, ‘French Film’, and textbooks are coming off the presses with titles such as Screening Ireland, Screening China, Italian National Cinema, and so on. But a wider conception of national image culture is around the corner, prophesied by phrases like ‘rooted cosmopolitanism’ and ‘critical regionalism’. (Andrew 2006: 26) Andrew's concluding remarks reference the recent emergence in film studies of a new critical vocabulary - ‘world cinema’, ‘transnational cinema’, ‘regional cinema’ - while his discussion of world cinema more generally responds to, and thus reflects, the need for fully developed conceptual models that will lend analytic precision to the terms in question. Particularly relevant in the present context is the way in which Andrew's reference to nations and to their inevitable persistence in film culture also acknowledges, at least implicitly, that innovative ways of understanding national elements must be part of the critical shift that is currently occurring in film studies.",
author = "Mette HJORT and Duncan PETRIE",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "21",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780748630929",
pages = "1--20",
booktitle = "The Cinema of Small Nations",
publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

HJORT, M & PETRIE, D 2007, Introduction. in The Cinema of Small Nations. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1-20.

Introduction. / HJORT, Mette; PETRIE, Duncan.

The Cinema of Small Nations. Edinburgh University Press, 2007. p. 1-20.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Introduction

AU - HJORT, Mette

AU - PETRIE, Duncan

PY - 2007/11/21

Y1 - 2007/11/21

N2 - In a recent article entitled ‘An Atlas of World Cinema’, Dudley Andrew concludes his discussion in the following way: Let me not be coy. We still parse the world by nations. Film festivals identify entries by country, college courses are labelled ‘Japanese Cinema’, ‘French Film’, and textbooks are coming off the presses with titles such as Screening Ireland, Screening China, Italian National Cinema, and so on. But a wider conception of national image culture is around the corner, prophesied by phrases like ‘rooted cosmopolitanism’ and ‘critical regionalism’. (Andrew 2006: 26) Andrew's concluding remarks reference the recent emergence in film studies of a new critical vocabulary - ‘world cinema’, ‘transnational cinema’, ‘regional cinema’ - while his discussion of world cinema more generally responds to, and thus reflects, the need for fully developed conceptual models that will lend analytic precision to the terms in question. Particularly relevant in the present context is the way in which Andrew's reference to nations and to their inevitable persistence in film culture also acknowledges, at least implicitly, that innovative ways of understanding national elements must be part of the critical shift that is currently occurring in film studies.

AB - In a recent article entitled ‘An Atlas of World Cinema’, Dudley Andrew concludes his discussion in the following way: Let me not be coy. We still parse the world by nations. Film festivals identify entries by country, college courses are labelled ‘Japanese Cinema’, ‘French Film’, and textbooks are coming off the presses with titles such as Screening Ireland, Screening China, Italian National Cinema, and so on. But a wider conception of national image culture is around the corner, prophesied by phrases like ‘rooted cosmopolitanism’ and ‘critical regionalism’. (Andrew 2006: 26) Andrew's concluding remarks reference the recent emergence in film studies of a new critical vocabulary - ‘world cinema’, ‘transnational cinema’, ‘regional cinema’ - while his discussion of world cinema more generally responds to, and thus reflects, the need for fully developed conceptual models that will lend analytic precision to the terms in question. Particularly relevant in the present context is the way in which Andrew's reference to nations and to their inevitable persistence in film culture also acknowledges, at least implicitly, that innovative ways of understanding national elements must be part of the critical shift that is currently occurring in film studies.

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6594

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9780748630929

SP - 1

EP - 20

BT - The Cinema of Small Nations

PB - Edinburgh University Press

ER -

HJORT M, PETRIE D. Introduction. In The Cinema of Small Nations. Edinburgh University Press. 2007. p. 1-20