Introduction

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearch

Abstract

Studies on Chinese early cinema and its extended history in the Republican period (1911–1949) have trod a rocky path.1 After the founding of the People’s Republic in 1949, film historiography developed into a guarded field, even until today. In the immediate postwar time the term “Republican” was tainted by its attachment to the defeated Nationalist Party and its associated autocratic capitalism, corrupt bureaucracy, and dependence on foreign imperialist powers. Because of these negative associations, the notion of Republican cinema became suspect and was subject to monitoring and constraint, in the 1950s and after. The formerly “infamous” epoch was acknowledged as pivotal to the development of Chinese modernity when the censorious treatment of the Republican period relaxed in the twenty-first century. Subsequently, Republican history was reconstructed by many scholars as Shanghai history, given the city’s unrivaled position (so-called Paris of the Orient) in early twentieth-century China. “Shanghai cinema” was then upheld as a synecdoche for cinema of the entire era as the city was then the country’s center of film production, distribution, and exhibition. The term “Shanghai,” despite its mythology (qipao, jazz, dance halls, intrigues, department stores, hippodrome, canidrome, dandies, motor cars, Ruan Lingyu, sultry Mandarin pop), risks reducing the scope of Republican history into a “looking glass” containing the most alluring facets. “Shanghai cinema,” too, when used as the overarching Republican cinema or Chinese cinema before 1949, entails a limited, partial approach to the vast terrains of cinema practices in many parts of China and colonies like Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macao, and the Chinese diaspora generally.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEarly film culture in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Republican China : kaleidoscopic histories
EditorsEmilie Yueh-yu YEH
Place of PublicationAnn Arbor
PublisherUniversity of Michigan Press
Pages1-16
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9780472901029, 9780472123445
ISBN (Print)9780472053728, 9780472073726
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Republican
Cinema
Shanghai
History
China
Orient
Bureaucracy
Chinese Diaspora
Hong Kong
Colonies
Imperialist
Monitoring
Nationalists
Historiography
Dance
Early Cinema
Jazz
1950s
Film Production
Modernity

Cite this

YEH, E. Y. (2018). Introduction. In E. Y. YEH (Ed.), Early film culture in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Republican China : kaleidoscopic histories (pp. 1-16). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
YEH, Emilie Yueh-yu. / Introduction. Early film culture in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Republican China : kaleidoscopic histories. editor / Emilie Yueh-yu YEH. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 2018. pp. 1-16
@inbook{ac27363b54b74e8989b148113fea380c,
title = "Introduction",
abstract = "Studies on Chinese early cinema and its extended history in the Republican period (1911–1949) have trod a rocky path.1 After the founding of the People’s Republic in 1949, film historiography developed into a guarded field, even until today. In the immediate postwar time the term “Republican” was tainted by its attachment to the defeated Nationalist Party and its associated autocratic capitalism, corrupt bureaucracy, and dependence on foreign imperialist powers. Because of these negative associations, the notion of Republican cinema became suspect and was subject to monitoring and constraint, in the 1950s and after. The formerly “infamous” epoch was acknowledged as pivotal to the development of Chinese modernity when the censorious treatment of the Republican period relaxed in the twenty-first century. Subsequently, Republican history was reconstructed by many scholars as Shanghai history, given the city’s unrivaled position (so-called Paris of the Orient) in early twentieth-century China. “Shanghai cinema” was then upheld as a synecdoche for cinema of the entire era as the city was then the country’s center of film production, distribution, and exhibition. The term “Shanghai,” despite its mythology (qipao, jazz, dance halls, intrigues, department stores, hippodrome, canidrome, dandies, motor cars, Ruan Lingyu, sultry Mandarin pop), risks reducing the scope of Republican history into a “looking glass” containing the most alluring facets. “Shanghai cinema,” too, when used as the overarching Republican cinema or Chinese cinema before 1949, entails a limited, partial approach to the vast terrains of cinema practices in many parts of China and colonies like Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macao, and the Chinese diaspora generally.",
author = "YEH, {Emilie Yueh-yu}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780472053728",
pages = "1--16",
editor = "YEH, {Emilie Yueh-yu}",
booktitle = "Early film culture in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Republican China : kaleidoscopic histories",
publisher = "University of Michigan Press",
address = "United States",

}

YEH, EY 2018, Introduction. in EY YEH (ed.), Early film culture in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Republican China : kaleidoscopic histories. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 1-16.

Introduction. / YEH, Emilie Yueh-yu.

Early film culture in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Republican China : kaleidoscopic histories. ed. / Emilie Yueh-yu YEH. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 2018. p. 1-16.

Research output: Book Chapters | Papers in Conference ProceedingsBook ChapterResearch

TY - CHAP

T1 - Introduction

AU - YEH, Emilie Yueh-yu

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - Studies on Chinese early cinema and its extended history in the Republican period (1911–1949) have trod a rocky path.1 After the founding of the People’s Republic in 1949, film historiography developed into a guarded field, even until today. In the immediate postwar time the term “Republican” was tainted by its attachment to the defeated Nationalist Party and its associated autocratic capitalism, corrupt bureaucracy, and dependence on foreign imperialist powers. Because of these negative associations, the notion of Republican cinema became suspect and was subject to monitoring and constraint, in the 1950s and after. The formerly “infamous” epoch was acknowledged as pivotal to the development of Chinese modernity when the censorious treatment of the Republican period relaxed in the twenty-first century. Subsequently, Republican history was reconstructed by many scholars as Shanghai history, given the city’s unrivaled position (so-called Paris of the Orient) in early twentieth-century China. “Shanghai cinema” was then upheld as a synecdoche for cinema of the entire era as the city was then the country’s center of film production, distribution, and exhibition. The term “Shanghai,” despite its mythology (qipao, jazz, dance halls, intrigues, department stores, hippodrome, canidrome, dandies, motor cars, Ruan Lingyu, sultry Mandarin pop), risks reducing the scope of Republican history into a “looking glass” containing the most alluring facets. “Shanghai cinema,” too, when used as the overarching Republican cinema or Chinese cinema before 1949, entails a limited, partial approach to the vast terrains of cinema practices in many parts of China and colonies like Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macao, and the Chinese diaspora generally.

AB - Studies on Chinese early cinema and its extended history in the Republican period (1911–1949) have trod a rocky path.1 After the founding of the People’s Republic in 1949, film historiography developed into a guarded field, even until today. In the immediate postwar time the term “Republican” was tainted by its attachment to the defeated Nationalist Party and its associated autocratic capitalism, corrupt bureaucracy, and dependence on foreign imperialist powers. Because of these negative associations, the notion of Republican cinema became suspect and was subject to monitoring and constraint, in the 1950s and after. The formerly “infamous” epoch was acknowledged as pivotal to the development of Chinese modernity when the censorious treatment of the Republican period relaxed in the twenty-first century. Subsequently, Republican history was reconstructed by many scholars as Shanghai history, given the city’s unrivaled position (so-called Paris of the Orient) in early twentieth-century China. “Shanghai cinema” was then upheld as a synecdoche for cinema of the entire era as the city was then the country’s center of film production, distribution, and exhibition. The term “Shanghai,” despite its mythology (qipao, jazz, dance halls, intrigues, department stores, hippodrome, canidrome, dandies, motor cars, Ruan Lingyu, sultry Mandarin pop), risks reducing the scope of Republican history into a “looking glass” containing the most alluring facets. “Shanghai cinema,” too, when used as the overarching Republican cinema or Chinese cinema before 1949, entails a limited, partial approach to the vast terrains of cinema practices in many parts of China and colonies like Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macao, and the Chinese diaspora generally.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058730205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Book Chapter

SN - 9780472053728

SN - 9780472073726

SP - 1

EP - 16

BT - Early film culture in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Republican China : kaleidoscopic histories

A2 - YEH, Emilie Yueh-yu

PB - University of Michigan Press

CY - Ann Arbor

ER -

YEH EY. Introduction. In YEH EY, editor, Early film culture in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Republican China : kaleidoscopic histories. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 2018. p. 1-16