Introduction : managing welfare expectations and social change : policy responses in Asia

Policy Responses in Asia

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The question whether Asian welfare types can be classified as distinctly ‘productivist’ has remained subject to lively debates: in East Asia, the recent implementation of social rights-based public policy innovations – including working family support – as a response to rising inequalities, welfare expectations and accelerating social change has been well documented; similarly, South East Asian and South Asian economies have featured much more frequently in comparative social policy analysis as policymakers have sought to address persisting chronic poverty, a diminishing demographic dividend and burdensome epidemiological transitions via integrating human capital formation with social protection measures. Yet, far from a unifying convergence of these social policy trends in the post-Millennium Development Goals era, the global perspective we take in this article suggests continued variation and difference, with a multiplicity of forms of globalizations encountered and/or engendered in diverse contexts. As a consequence, variegated and path-dependent patterns of social development continue to persist across Asian economies. These findings, in turn, address major issues of our time, for they speak to the broader question of what analytical bases and research strategies can best reveal the complexities of (and interactions between) national, extra-national and transnational drivers of welfare formation and development under contemporary but diverse conditions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)845-856
Number of pages12
JournalSocial Policy and Administration
Volume51
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

social policy
social change
welfare
capital formation
global perspective
policy analysis
human capital
social development
globalization
poverty
social rights
economy
innovation
public policy
driver
trend
interaction
Asia
policy
Social Policy

Keywords

  • Asian social development
  • Divergence
  • Global social policy
  • Post-productivism
  • Productivism

Cite this

@article{2dd55ef0f559453abf2df723ab3dd93f,
title = "Introduction : managing welfare expectations and social change : policy responses in Asia: Policy Responses in Asia",
abstract = "The question whether Asian welfare types can be classified as distinctly ‘productivist’ has remained subject to lively debates: in East Asia, the recent implementation of social rights-based public policy innovations – including working family support – as a response to rising inequalities, welfare expectations and accelerating social change has been well documented; similarly, South East Asian and South Asian economies have featured much more frequently in comparative social policy analysis as policymakers have sought to address persisting chronic poverty, a diminishing demographic dividend and burdensome epidemiological transitions via integrating human capital formation with social protection measures. Yet, far from a unifying convergence of these social policy trends in the post-Millennium Development Goals era, the global perspective we take in this article suggests continued variation and difference, with a multiplicity of forms of globalizations encountered and/or engendered in diverse contexts. As a consequence, variegated and path-dependent patterns of social development continue to persist across Asian economies. These findings, in turn, address major issues of our time, for they speak to the broader question of what analytical bases and research strategies can best reveal the complexities of (and interactions between) national, extra-national and transnational drivers of welfare formation and development under contemporary but diverse conditions.",
keywords = "Asian social development, Divergence, Global social policy, Post-productivism, Productivism",
author = "MOK, {Ka Ho, Joshua} and Stefan K{\"U}HNER and Nicola YEATES",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/spol.12335",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "845--856",
journal = "Social Policy and Administration",
issn = "0144-5596",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Introduction : managing welfare expectations and social change : policy responses in Asia : Policy Responses in Asia. / MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua; KÜHNER, Stefan; YEATES, Nicola.

In: Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 51, No. 6, 01.11.2017, p. 845-856.

Research output: Journal PublicationsJournal Article (refereed)Researchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction : managing welfare expectations and social change : policy responses in Asia

T2 - Policy Responses in Asia

AU - MOK, Ka Ho, Joshua

AU - KÜHNER, Stefan

AU - YEATES, Nicola

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - The question whether Asian welfare types can be classified as distinctly ‘productivist’ has remained subject to lively debates: in East Asia, the recent implementation of social rights-based public policy innovations – including working family support – as a response to rising inequalities, welfare expectations and accelerating social change has been well documented; similarly, South East Asian and South Asian economies have featured much more frequently in comparative social policy analysis as policymakers have sought to address persisting chronic poverty, a diminishing demographic dividend and burdensome epidemiological transitions via integrating human capital formation with social protection measures. Yet, far from a unifying convergence of these social policy trends in the post-Millennium Development Goals era, the global perspective we take in this article suggests continued variation and difference, with a multiplicity of forms of globalizations encountered and/or engendered in diverse contexts. As a consequence, variegated and path-dependent patterns of social development continue to persist across Asian economies. These findings, in turn, address major issues of our time, for they speak to the broader question of what analytical bases and research strategies can best reveal the complexities of (and interactions between) national, extra-national and transnational drivers of welfare formation and development under contemporary but diverse conditions.

AB - The question whether Asian welfare types can be classified as distinctly ‘productivist’ has remained subject to lively debates: in East Asia, the recent implementation of social rights-based public policy innovations – including working family support – as a response to rising inequalities, welfare expectations and accelerating social change has been well documented; similarly, South East Asian and South Asian economies have featured much more frequently in comparative social policy analysis as policymakers have sought to address persisting chronic poverty, a diminishing demographic dividend and burdensome epidemiological transitions via integrating human capital formation with social protection measures. Yet, far from a unifying convergence of these social policy trends in the post-Millennium Development Goals era, the global perspective we take in this article suggests continued variation and difference, with a multiplicity of forms of globalizations encountered and/or engendered in diverse contexts. As a consequence, variegated and path-dependent patterns of social development continue to persist across Asian economies. These findings, in turn, address major issues of our time, for they speak to the broader question of what analytical bases and research strategies can best reveal the complexities of (and interactions between) national, extra-national and transnational drivers of welfare formation and development under contemporary but diverse conditions.

KW - Asian social development

KW - Divergence

KW - Global social policy

KW - Post-productivism

KW - Productivism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030233178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/6157

U2 - 10.1111/spol.12335

DO - 10.1111/spol.12335

M3 - Journal Article (refereed)

VL - 51

SP - 845

EP - 856

JO - Social Policy and Administration

JF - Social Policy and Administration

SN - 0144-5596

IS - 6

ER -